Core Actions

Showing comments and forms 1 to 3 of 3

Support

Rights of Way Improvement Plan (ROWIP)

Representation ID: 10

Received: 07/02/2009

Respondent: Dr P D Wadey

Representation Summary:

Support Core Actions A and B.

Object

Rights of Way Improvement Plan (ROWIP)

Representation ID: 11

Received: 07/02/2009

Respondent: Dr P D Wadey

Representation Summary:

Object to Core Action C. The text should note that as bridleways and byways are such a small part of the recorded PRoW network, more effort will be placed on creating bridleways. It should also record the fact that pedal cyclists can use bridleways by virtue of s.30 Countryside Act 1968, and hence that creation of bridleways can also assist with joining up networks for cyclists.

Comment

Rights of Way Improvement Plan (ROWIP)

Representation ID: 19

Received: 24/02/2009

Respondent: Essex LAF

Representation Summary:

Core action B -Implementation -
The statement that a funding review is required as it is insufficient for maintenance or provision of staff is not acceptable, SoS BC has a statutory duty to fulfil the requirements of PROWs, funds must be identified and provided.