26. Do you agree with the suggested option?
Support
Development Management Development Plan (DPD)
Representation ID: 476
Received: 03/08/2010
Respondent: Carole Mulroney
particular care needs to be taken in consevation areas
Support
Development Management Development Plan (DPD)
Representation ID: 669
Received: 09/08/2010
Respondent: Renaissance Southend Ltd
Renaissance Southend agrees with the statement that flooding issues should not impact upon future development with the proviso that detailed flood risk assessments are undertaken before permission is granted.
There should be consistency between the DM DPD and the SCAAP on this issue.
Comment
Development Management Development Plan (DPD)
Representation ID: 767
Received: 10/08/2010
Respondent: Burges Estate Residents Association
Page 33. The suggested option presumes that the parent building has merit which the extension should emulate. That may not be the case and therefore some allowance should be made to ensure an extension respects both the parent building as it is and as its character was.
Comment
Development Management Development Plan (DPD)
Representation ID: 957
Received: 19/10/2010
Respondent: English Heritage
Issue DM6 - Alterations and additions to existing buildings, p32
Alterations and additions- suggested option, p33
English Heritage recommends that extra specific guidance should be provided to inform those considering alterations and additions to listed and locally listed buildings, and buildings in conservation areas.
Support
Development Management Development Plan (DPD)
Representation ID: 997
Received: 20/10/2010
Respondent: Savills
Generally support thrust of preferred option, as the alternative option is limited.