26. Do you agree with the suggested option?

Support

Representation ID: 476

Received: 03/08/2010

Respondent: Carole Mulroney

particular care needs to be taken in consevation areas

Support

Representation ID: 669

Received: 09/08/2010

Respondent: Renaissance Southend Ltd

Renaissance Southend agrees with the statement that flooding issues should not impact upon future development with the proviso that detailed flood risk assessments are undertaken before permission is granted.

There should be consistency between the DM DPD and the SCAAP on this issue.

Comment

Representation ID: 767

Received: 10/08/2010

Respondent: Burges Estate Residents Association

Page 33. The suggested option presumes that the parent building has merit which the extension should emulate. That may not be the case and therefore some allowance should be made to ensure an extension respects both the parent building as it is and as its character was.

Comment

Representation ID: 957

Received: 19/10/2010

Respondent: English Heritage

Issue DM6 - Alterations and additions to existing buildings, p32

Alterations and additions- suggested option, p33
English Heritage recommends that extra specific guidance should be provided to inform those considering alterations and additions to listed and locally listed buildings, and buildings in conservation areas.

Support

Representation ID: 997

Received: 20/10/2010

Respondent: Savills

Generally support thrust of preferred option, as the alternative option is limited.