152
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Revised Proposed Submission 2016
Representation ID: 2669
Received: 13/12/2016
Respondent: Legenddeli Ltd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Effective
The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
UNSOUND Positively Prepared
1. The SCAAP document does not recognise the need for more parking spaces in the central area and fails to implement a policy to increase parking capacity particularly in the south central area (seafront). This is despite the Local Transport Plan3 stating demand for parking in the central area will increase by 25% in the next 4 years.
2. If adopted the transport section of the SCAAP will result in increased congestion and journey times.
Justified
3. I object to the use of the Car Parking Study produced by Steer Davies Gleave as it is flawed and based on Car parking surveys carried out in bad weather and on inaccurate, unreliable data from the council's VMS system. The parking report and surveys have underestimated the parking stock, particularly in the central area to the south of railway, and thus has underestimated the demand for spaces from visitors to the seafront. The surveys have been predominantly focused on the High Street thus the parking situation & demand to the south of the railway line has been misrepresented even though the southern area has been identified as the area which experiences the greatest pressure on its parking supply. The report relies on over 99% of data from the VMS system which is inaccurate and unreliable.
4. The SCAAP document and its Car Parking Survey fails to recognise that on many busy days the current car park network can't cope with demand.
Effective
5. The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
Consistent with National Policy
6. Policy DS5, by failing to deliver sufficient parking capacity, and by introducing sustainable transport measures will create congestion and have a major negative impact on my business. Customer by car will not be able to access and park in the central area and thus will not be able to or will make the choice not to visit the central area. The NPPF is clear that policies should contribute to building a strong responsive and competitive economy. The provision of infrastructure is vital to this and the plan should proactively meet the development demands of business. This plan will deter from economic growth as it does not allow for the growth in visitor numbers by car.
7. The government recognises that different policies and measures will be required in different communities and opportunities to maximise sustainable transport solutions will vary. Due to large numbers of visitors coming to Southend by car and due to its geographical location and access routes measures such as bus lanes and cycle routes only add to congestion. The public transport system is not of a high quality and is unsuitable for families wishing to visit Southend from outside the area.
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Revised Proposed Submission 2016
Representation ID: 2673
Received: 13/12/2016
Respondent: southend rock & gifts
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Effective
The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
UNSOUND Positively Prepared
1. The SCAAP document does not recognise the need for more parking spaces in the central area and fails to implement a policy to increase parking capacity particularly in the south central area (seafront). This is despite the Local Transport Plan3 stating demand for parking in the central area will increase by 25% in the next 4 years.
2. If adopted the transport section of the SCAAP will result in increased congestion and journey times.
Justified
3. I object to the use of the Car Parking Study produced by Steer Davies Gleave as it is flawed and based on Car parking surveys carried out in bad weather and on inaccurate, unreliable data from the council's VMS system. The parking report and surveys have underestimated the parking stock, particularly in the central area to the south of railway, and thus has underestimated the demand for spaces from visitors to the seafront. The surveys have been predominantly focused on the High Street thus the parking situation & demand to the south of the railway line has been misrepresented even though the southern area has been identified as the area which experiences the greatest pressure on its parking supply. The report relies on over 99% of data from the VMS system which is inaccurate and unreliable.
4. The SCAAP document and its Car Parking Survey fails to recognise that on many busy days the current car park network can't cope with demand.
Effective
5. The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
Consistent with National Policy
6. Policy DS5, by failing to deliver sufficient parking capacity, and by introducing sustainable transport measures will create congestion and have a major negative impact on my business. Customer by car will not be able to access and park in the central area and thus will not be able to or will make the choice not to visit the central area. The NPPF is clear that policies should contribute to building a strong responsive and competitive economy. The provision of infrastructure is vital to this and the plan should proactively meet the development demands of business. This plan will deter from economic growth as it does not allow for the growth in visitor numbers by car.
7. The government recognises that different policies and measures will be required in different communities and opportunities to maximise sustainable transport solutions will vary. Due to large numbers of visitors coming to Southend by car and due to its geographical location and access routes measures such as bus lanes and cycle routes only add to congestion. The public transport system is not of a high quality and is unsuitable for families wishing to visit Southend from outside the area.
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Revised Proposed Submission 2016
Representation ID: 2677
Received: 13/12/2016
Respondent: Chinnerys Public House
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Effective
The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Revised Proposed Submission 2016
Representation ID: 2682
Received: 13/12/2016
Respondent: Maynard Martin Insurance Services LLP
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Effective
The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Revised Proposed Submission 2016
Representation ID: 2687
Received: 13/12/2016
Respondent: Rossi Ice Cream
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Effective
The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
UNSOUND Positively Prepared
1. The SCAAP document does not recognise the need for more parking spaces in the central area and fails to implement a policy to increase parking capacity particularly in the south central area (seafront). This is despite the Local Transport Plan3 stating demand for parking in the central area will increase by 25% in the next 4 years.
2. If adopted the transport section of the SCAAP will result in increased congestion and journey times.
Justified
3. I object to the use of the Car Parking Study produced by Steer Davies Gleave as it is flawed and based on Car parking surveys carried out in bad weather and on inaccurate, unreliable data from the council's VMS system. The parking report and surveys have underestimated the parking stock, particularly in the central area to the south of railway, and thus has underestimated the demand for spaces from visitors to the seafront. The surveys have been predominantly focused on the High Street thus the parking situation & demand to the south of the railway line has been misrepresented even though the southern area has been identified as the area which experiences the greatest pressure on its parking supply. The report relies on over 99% of data from the VMS system which is inaccurate and unreliable.
4. The SCAAP document and its Car Parking Survey fails to recognise that on many busy days the current car park network can't cope with demand.
Effective
5. The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
Consistent with National Policy
6. Policy DS5, by failing to deliver sufficient parking capacity, and by introducing sustainable transport measures will create congestion and have a major negative impact on my business. Customer by car will not be able to access and park in the central area and thus will not be able to or will make the choice not to visit the central area. The NPPF is clear that policies should contribute to building a strong responsive and competitive economy. The provision of infrastructure is vital to this and the plan should proactively meet the development demands of business. This plan will deter from economic growth as it does not allow for the growth in visitor numbers by car.
7. The government recognises that different policies and measures will be required in different communities and opportunities to maximise sustainable transport solutions will vary. Due to large numbers of visitors coming to Southend by car and due to its geographical location and access routes measures such as bus lanes and cycle routes only add to congestion. The public transport system is not of a high quality and is unsuitable for families wishing to visit Southend from outside the area.
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Revised Proposed Submission 2016
Representation ID: 2691
Received: 13/12/2016
Respondent: Annies Bistro
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
UNSOUND Positively Prepared
1. The SCAAP document does not recognise the need for more parking spaces in the central area and fails to implement a policy to increase parking capacity particularly in the south central area (seafront). This is despite the Local Transport Plan3 stating demand for parking in the central area will increase by 25% in the next 4 years.
2. If adopted the transport section of the SCAAP will result in increased congestion and journey times.
Justified
3. I object to the use of the Car Parking Study produced by Steer Davies Gleave as it is flawed and based on Car parking surveys carried out in bad weather and on inaccurate, unreliable data from the council's VMS system. The parking report and surveys have underestimated the parking stock, particularly in the central area to the south of railway, and thus has underestimated the demand for spaces from visitors to the seafront. The surveys have been predominantly focused on the High Street thus the parking situation & demand to the south of the railway line has been misrepresented even though the southern area has been identified as the area which experiences the greatest pressure on its parking supply. The report relies on over 99% of data from the VMS system which is inaccurate and unreliable.
4. The SCAAP document and its Car Parking Survey fails to recognise that on many busy days the current car park network can't cope with demand.
Effective
5. The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
Consistent with National Policy
6. Policy DS5, by failing to deliver sufficient parking capacity, and by introducing sustainable transport measures will create congestion and have a major negative impact on my business. Customer by car will not be able to access and park in the central area and thus will not be able to or will make the choice not to visit the central area. The NPPF is clear that policies should contribute to building a strong responsive and competitive economy. The provision of infrastructure is vital to this and the plan should proactively meet the development demands of business. This plan will deter from economic growth as it does not allow for the growth in visitor numbers by car.
7. The government recognises that different policies and measures will be required in different communities and opportunities to maximise sustainable transport solutions will vary. Due to large numbers of visitors coming to Southend by car and due to its geographical location and access routes measures such as bus lanes and cycle routes only add to congestion. The public transport system is not of a high quality and is unsuitable for families wishing to visit Southend from outside the area.
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Revised Proposed Submission 2016
Representation ID: 2695
Received: 13/12/2016
Respondent: Stuarts
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Effective
The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
UNSOUND Positively Prepared
1. The SCAAP document does not recognise the need for more parking spaces in the central area and fails to implement a policy to increase parking capacity particularly in the south central area (seafront). This is despite the Local Transport Plan3 stating demand for parking in the central area will increase by 25% in the next 4 years.
2. If adopted the transport section of the SCAAP will result in increased congestion and journey times.
Justified
3. I object to the use of the Car Parking Study produced by Steer Davies Gleave as it is flawed and based on Car parking surveys carried out in bad weather and on inaccurate, unreliable data from the council's VMS system. The parking report and surveys have underestimated the parking stock, particularly in the central area to the south of railway, and thus has underestimated the demand for spaces from visitors to the seafront. The surveys have been predominantly focused on the High Street thus the parking situation & demand to the south of the railway line has been misrepresented even though the southern area has been identified as the area which experiences the greatest pressure on its parking supply. The report relies on over 99% of data from the VMS system which is inaccurate and unreliable.
4. The SCAAP document and its Car Parking Survey fails to recognise that on many busy days the current car park network can't cope with demand.
Effective
5. The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
Consistent with National Policy
6. Policy DS5, by failing to deliver sufficient parking capacity, and by introducing sustainable transport measures will create congestion and have a major negative impact on my business. Customer by car will not be able to access and park in the central area and thus will not be able to or will make the choice not to visit the central area. The NPPF is clear that policies should contribute to building a strong responsive and competitive economy. The provision of infrastructure is vital to this and the plan should proactively meet the development demands of business. This plan will deter from economic growth as it does not allow for the growth in visitor numbers by car.
7. The government recognises that different policies and measures will be required in different communities and opportunities to maximise sustainable transport solutions will vary. Due to large numbers of visitors coming to Southend by car and due to its geographical location and access routes measures such as bus lanes and cycle routes only add to congestion. The public transport system is not of a high quality and is unsuitable for families wishing to visit Southend from outside the area.
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Revised Proposed Submission 2016
Representation ID: 2699
Received: 13/12/2016
Respondent: Clarence House Jewellers
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Effective
The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
UNSOUND Positively Prepared
1. The SCAAP document does not recognise the need for more parking spaces in the central area and fails to implement a policy to increase parking capacity particularly in the south central area (seafront). This is despite the Local Transport Plan3 stating demand for parking in the central area will increase by 25% in the next 4 years.
2. If adopted the transport section of the SCAAP will result in increased congestion and journey times.
Justified
3. I object to the use of the Car Parking Study produced by Steer Davies Gleave as it is flawed and based on Car parking surveys carried out in bad weather and on inaccurate, unreliable data from the council's VMS system. The parking report and surveys have underestimated the parking stock, particularly in the central area to the south of railway, and thus has underestimated the demand for spaces from visitors to the seafront. The surveys have been predominantly focused on the High Street thus the parking situation & demand to the south of the railway line has been misrepresented even though the southern area has been identified as the area which experiences the greatest pressure on its parking supply. The report relies on over 99% of data from the VMS system which is inaccurate and unreliable.
4. The SCAAP document and its Car Parking Survey fails to recognise that on many busy days the current car park network can't cope with demand.
Effective
5. The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
Consistent with National Policy
6. Policy DS5, by failing to deliver sufficient parking capacity, and by introducing sustainable transport measures will create congestion and have a major negative impact on my business. Customer by car will not be able to access and park in the central area and thus will not be able to or will make the choice not to visit the central area. The NPPF is clear that policies should contribute to building a strong responsive and competitive economy. The provision of infrastructure is vital to this and the plan should proactively meet the development demands of business. This plan will deter from economic growth as it does not allow for the growth in visitor numbers by car.
7. The government recognises that different policies and measures will be required in different communities and opportunities to maximise sustainable transport solutions will vary. Due to large numbers of visitors coming to Southend by car and due to its geographical location and access routes measures such as bus lanes and cycle routes only add to congestion. The public transport system is not of a high quality and is unsuitable for families wishing to visit Southend from outside the area.
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Revised Proposed Submission 2016
Representation ID: 2703
Received: 13/12/2016
Respondent: The PawnBroker
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Effective
The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
UNSOUND Positively Prepared
1. The SCAAP document does not recognise the need for more parking spaces in the central area and fails to implement a policy to increase parking capacity particularly in the south central area (seafront). This is despite the Local Transport Plan3 stating demand for parking in the central area will increase by 25% in the next 4 years.
2. If adopted the transport section of the SCAAP will result in increased congestion and journey times.
Justified
3. I object to the use of the Car Parking Study produced by Steer Davies Gleave as it is flawed and based on Car parking surveys carried out in bad weather and on inaccurate, unreliable data from the council's VMS system. The parking report and surveys have underestimated the parking stock, particularly in the central area to the south of railway, and thus has underestimated the demand for spaces from visitors to the seafront. The surveys have been predominantly focused on the High Street thus the parking situation & demand to the south of the railway line has been misrepresented even though the southern area has been identified as the area which experiences the greatest pressure on its parking supply. The report relies on over 99% of data from the VMS system which is inaccurate and unreliable.
4. The SCAAP document and its Car Parking Survey fails to recognise that on many busy days the current car park network can't cope with demand.
Effective
5. The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
Consistent with National Policy
6. Policy DS5, by failing to deliver sufficient parking capacity, and by introducing sustainable transport measures will create congestion and have a major negative impact on my business. Customer by car will not be able to access and park in the central area and thus will not be able to or will make the choice not to visit the central area. The NPPF is clear that policies should contribute to building a strong responsive and competitive economy. The provision of infrastructure is vital to this and the plan should proactively meet the development demands of business. This plan will deter from economic growth as it does not allow for the growth in visitor numbers by car.
7. The government recognises that different policies and measures will be required in different communities and opportunities to maximise sustainable transport solutions will vary. Due to large numbers of visitors coming to Southend by car and due to its geographical location and access routes measures such as bus lanes and cycle routes only add to congestion. The public transport system is not of a high quality and is unsuitable for families wishing to visit Southend from outside the area
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Revised Proposed Submission 2016
Representation ID: 2707
Received: 13/12/2016
Respondent: Bizarre
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Effective
The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
UNSOUND Positively Prepared
1. The SCAAP document does not recognise the need for more parking spaces in the central area and fails to implement a policy to increase parking capacity particularly in the south central area (seafront). This is despite the Local Transport Plan3 stating demand for parking in the central area will increase by 25% in the next 4 years.
2. If adopted the transport section of the SCAAP will result in increased congestion and journey times.
Justified
3. I object to the use of the Car Parking Study produced by Steer Davies Gleave as it is flawed and based on Car parking surveys carried out in bad weather and on inaccurate, unreliable data from the council's VMS system. The parking report and surveys have underestimated the parking stock, particularly in the central area to the south of railway, and thus has underestimated the demand for spaces from visitors to the seafront. The surveys have been predominantly focused on the High Street thus the parking situation & demand to the south of the railway line has been misrepresented even though the southern area has been identified as the area which experiences the greatest pressure on its parking supply. The report relies on over 99% of data from the VMS system which is inaccurate and unreliable.
4. The SCAAP document and its Car Parking Survey fails to recognise that on many busy days the current car park network can't cope with demand.
Effective
5. The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
Consistent with National Policy
6. Policy DS5, by failing to deliver sufficient parking capacity, and by introducing sustainable transport measures will create congestion and have a major negative impact on my business. Customer by car will not be able to access and park in the central area and thus will not be able to or will make the choice not to visit the central area. The NPPF is clear that policies should contribute to building a strong responsive and competitive economy. The provision of infrastructure is vital to this and the plan should proactively meet the development demands of business. This plan will deter from economic growth as it does not allow for the growth in visitor numbers by car.
7. The government recognises that different policies and measures will be required in different communities and opportunities to maximise sustainable transport solutions will vary. Due to large numbers of visitors coming to Southend by car and due to its geographical location and access routes measures such as bus lanes and cycle routes only add to congestion. The public transport system is not of a high quality and is unsuitable for families wishing to visit Southend from outside the area.
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Revised Proposed Submission 2016
Representation ID: 2712
Received: 13/12/2016
Respondent: East Anglia Pubs Co
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Effective
The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Revised Proposed Submission 2016
Representation ID: 2716
Received: 13/12/2016
Respondent: H20 Barber Shop
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Effective
The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
UNSOUND Positively Prepared
1. The SCAAP document does not recognise the need for more parking spaces in the central area and fails to implement a policy to increase parking capacity particularly in the south central area (seafront). This is despite the Local Transport Plan3 stating demand for parking in the central area will increase by 25% in the next 4 years.
2. If adopted the transport section of the SCAAP will result in increased congestion and journey times.
Justified
3. I object to the use of the Car Parking Study produced by Steer Davies Gleave as it is flawed and based on Car parking surveys carried out in bad weather and on inaccurate, unreliable data from the council's VMS system. The parking report and surveys have underestimated the parking stock, particularly in the central area to the south of railway, and thus has underestimated the demand for spaces from visitors to the seafront. The surveys have been predominantly focused on the High Street thus the parking situation & demand to the south of the railway line has been misrepresented even though the southern area has been identified as the area which experiences the greatest pressure on its parking supply. The report relies on over 99% of data from the VMS system which is inaccurate and unreliable.
4. The SCAAP document and its Car Parking Survey fails to recognise that on many busy days the current car park network can't cope with demand.
Effective
5. The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
Consistent with National Policy
6. Policy DS5, by failing to deliver sufficient parking capacity, and by introducing sustainable transport measures will create congestion and have a major negative impact on my business. Customer by car will not be able to access and park in the central area and thus will not be able to or will make the choice not to visit the central area. The NPPF is clear that policies should contribute to building a strong responsive and competitive economy. The provision of infrastructure is vital to this and the plan should proactively meet the development demands of business. This plan will deter from economic growth as it does not allow for the growth in visitor numbers by car.
7. The government recognises that different policies and measures will be required in different communities and opportunities to maximise sustainable transport solutions will vary. Due to large numbers of visitors coming to Southend by car and due to its geographical location and access routes measures such as bus lanes and cycle routes only add to congestion. The public transport system is not of a high quality and is unsuitable for families wishing to visit Southend from outside the area.
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Revised Proposed Submission 2016
Representation ID: 2720
Received: 13/12/2016
Respondent: Sancto Party Store
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Effective
The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Revised Proposed Submission 2016
Representation ID: 2725
Received: 13/12/2016
Respondent: Ravens of Southend
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Effective
The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Revised Proposed Submission 2016
Representation ID: 2730
Received: 13/12/2016
Respondent: Laurelle London Ltd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Effective
The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
UNSOUND Positively Prepared
1. The SCAAP document does not recognise the need for more parking spaces in the central area and fails to implement a policy to increase parking capacity particularly in the south central area (seafront). This is despite the Local Transport Plan3 stating demand for parking in the central area will increase by 25% in the next 4 years.
2. If adopted the transport section of the SCAAP will result in increased congestion and journey times.
Justified
3. I object to the use of the Car Parking Study produced by Steer Davies Gleave as it is flawed and based on Car parking surveys carried out in bad weather and on inaccurate, unreliable data from the council's VMS system. The parking report and surveys have underestimated the parking stock, particularly in the central area to the south of railway, and thus has underestimated the demand for spaces from visitors to the seafront. The surveys have been predominantly focused on the High Street thus the parking situation & demand to the south of the railway line has been misrepresented even though the southern area has been identified as the area which experiences the greatest pressure on its parking supply. The report relies on over 99% of data from the VMS system which is inaccurate and unreliable.
4. The SCAAP document and its Car Parking Survey fails to recognise that on many busy days the current car park network can't cope with demand.
Effective
5. The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
Consistent with National Policy
6. Policy DS5, by failing to deliver sufficient parking capacity, and by introducing sustainable transport measures will create congestion and have a major negative impact on my business. Customer by car will not be able to access and park in the central area and thus will not be able to or will make the choice not to visit the central area. The NPPF is clear that policies should contribute to building a strong responsive and competitive economy. The provision of infrastructure is vital to this and the plan should proactively meet the development demands of business. This plan will deter from economic growth as it does not allow for the growth in visitor numbers by car.
7. The government recognises that different policies and measures will be required in different communities and opportunities to maximise sustainable transport solutions will vary. Due to large numbers of visitors coming to Southend by car and due to its geographical location and access routes measures such as bus lanes and cycle routes only add to congestion. The public transport system is not of a high quality and is unsuitable for families wishing to visit Southend from outside the area.
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Revised Proposed Submission 2016
Representation ID: 2734
Received: 13/12/2016
Respondent: Las Vegas Grill
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Effective
The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
Consistent with National Policy
Policy DS5, by failing to deliver sufficient parking capacity, and by introducing sustainable transport measures will create congestion and have a major negative impact on my business. Customer by car will not be able to access and park in the central area and thus will not be able to or will make the choice not to visit the central area. The NPPF is clear that policies should contribute to building a strong responsive and competitive economy. The provision of infrastructure is vital to this and the plan should proactively meet the development demands of business. This plan will deter from economic growth as it does not allow for the growth in visitor numbers by car.
The government recognises that different policies and measures will be required in different communities and opportunities to maximise sustainable transport solutions will vary. Due to large numbers of visitors coming to Southend by car and due to its geographical location and access routes measures such as bus lanes and cycle routes only add to congestion. The public transport system is not of a high quality and is unsuitable for families wishing to visit Southend from outside the area.
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Revised Proposed Submission 2016
Representation ID: 2739
Received: 13/12/2016
Respondent: Copacabana Leisure
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Effective
The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
UNSOUND Positively Prepared
1. The SCAAP document does not recognise the need for more parking spaces in the central area and fails to implement a policy to increase parking capacity particularly in the south central area (seafront). This is despite the Local Transport Plan3 stating demand for parking in the central area will increase by 25% in the next 4 years.
2. If adopted the transport section of the SCAAP will result in increased congestion and journey times.
Justified
3. I object to the use of the Car Parking Study produced by Steer Davies Gleave as it is flawed and based on Car parking surveys carried out in bad weather and on inaccurate, unreliable data from the council's VMS system. The parking report and surveys have underestimated the parking stock, particularly in the central area to the south of railway, and thus has underestimated the demand for spaces from visitors to the seafront. The surveys have been predominantly focused on the High Street thus the parking situation & demand to the south of the railway line has been misrepresented even though the southern area has been identified as the area which experiences the greatest pressure on its parking supply. The report relies on over 99% of data from the VMS system which is inaccurate and unreliable.
4. The SCAAP document and its Car Parking Survey fails to recognise that on many busy days the current car park network can't cope with demand.
Effective
5. The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
Consistent with National Policy
6. Policy DS5, by failing to deliver sufficient parking capacity, and by introducing sustainable transport measures will create congestion and have a major negative impact on my business. Customer by car will not be able to access and park in the central area and thus will not be able to or will make the choice not to visit the central area. The NPPF is clear that policies should contribute to building a strong responsive and competitive economy. The provision of infrastructure is vital to this and the plan should proactively meet the development demands of business. This plan will deter from economic growth as it does not allow for the growth in visitor numbers by car.
7. The government recognises that different policies and measures will be required in different communities and opportunities to maximise sustainable transport solutions will vary. Due to large numbers of visitors coming to Southend by car and due to its geographical location and access routes measures such as bus lanes and cycle routes only add to congestion. The public transport system is not of a high quality and is unsuitable for families wishing to visit Southend from outside the area.
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Revised Proposed Submission 2016
Representation ID: 2743
Received: 13/12/2016
Respondent: Rio Leisure Ltd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Effective
The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
UNSOUND Positively Prepared
1. The SCAAP document does not recognise the need for more parking spaces in the central area and fails to implement a policy to increase parking capacity particularly in the south central area (seafront). This is despite the Local Transport Plan3 stating demand for parking in the central area will increase by 25% in the next 4 years.
2. If adopted the transport section of the SCAAP will result in increased congestion and journey times.
Justified
3. I object to the use of the Car Parking Study produced by Steer Davies Gleave as it is flawed and based on Car parking surveys carried out in bad weather and on inaccurate, unreliable data from the council's VMS system. The parking report and surveys have underestimated the parking stock, particularly in the central area to the south of railway, and thus has underestimated the demand for spaces from visitors to the seafront. The surveys have been predominantly focused on the High Street thus the parking situation & demand to the south of the railway line has been misrepresented even though the southern area has been identified as the area which experiences the greatest pressure on its parking supply. The report relies on over 99% of data from the VMS system which is inaccurate and unreliable.
4. The SCAAP document and its Car Parking Survey fails to recognise that on many busy days the current car park network can't cope with demand.
Effective
5. The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
Consistent with National Policy
6. Policy DS5, by failing to deliver sufficient parking capacity, and by introducing sustainable transport measures will create congestion and have a major negative impact on my business. Customer by car will not be able to access and park in the central area and thus will not be able to or will make the choice not to visit the central area. The NPPF is clear that policies should contribute to building a strong responsive and competitive economy. The provision of infrastructure is vital to this and the plan should proactively meet the development demands of business. This plan will deter from economic growth as it does not allow for the growth in visitor numbers by car.
7. The government recognises that different policies and measures will be required in different communities and opportunities to maximise sustainable transport solutions will vary. Due to large numbers of visitors coming to Southend by car and due to its geographical location and access routes measures such as bus lanes and cycle routes only add to congestion. The public transport system is not of a high quality and is unsuitable for families wishing to visit Southend from outside the area.
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Revised Proposed Submission 2016
Representation ID: 2747
Received: 13/12/2016
Respondent: Clarkes Restaurant
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Effective
The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Revised Proposed Submission 2016
Representation ID: 2752
Received: 13/12/2016
Respondent: Star Amusements
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Effective
The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
UNSOUND Positively Prepared
1. The SCAAP document does not recognise the need for more parking spaces in the central area and fails to implement a policy to increase parking capacity particularly in the south central area (seafront). This is despite the Local Transport Plan3 stating demand for parking in the central area will increase by 25% in the next 4 years.
2. If adopted the transport section of the SCAAP will result in increased congestion and journey times.
Justified
3. I object to the use of the Car Parking Study produced by Steer Davies Gleave as it is flawed and based on Car parking surveys carried out in bad weather and on inaccurate, unreliable data from the council's VMS system. The parking report and surveys have underestimated the parking stock, particularly in the central area to the south of railway, and thus has underestimated the demand for spaces from visitors to the seafront. The surveys have been predominantly focused on the High Street thus the parking situation & demand to the south of the railway line has been misrepresented even though the southern area has been identified as the area which experiences the greatest pressure on its parking supply. The report relies on over 99% of data from the VMS system which is inaccurate and unreliable.
4. The SCAAP document and its Car Parking Survey fails to recognise that on many busy days the current car park network can't cope with demand.
Effective
5. The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
Consistent with National Policy
6. Policy DS5, by failing to deliver sufficient parking capacity, and by introducing sustainable transport measures will create congestion and have a major negative impact on my business. Customer by car will not be able to access and park in the central area and thus will not be able to or will make the choice not to visit the central area. The NPPF is clear that policies should contribute to building a strong responsive and competitive economy. The provision of infrastructure is vital to this and the plan should proactively meet the development demands of business. This plan will deter from economic growth as it does not allow for the growth in visitor numbers by car.
7. The government recognises that different policies and measures will be required in different communities and opportunities to maximise sustainable transport solutions will vary. Due to large numbers of visitors coming to Southend by car and due to its geographical location and access routes measures such as bus lanes and cycle routes only add to congestion. The public transport system is not of a high quality and is unsuitable for families wishing to visit Southend from outside the area.
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Revised Proposed Submission 2016
Representation ID: 2756
Received: 13/12/2016
Respondent: Neptune Fish Restaurant
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Effective
The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Revised Proposed Submission 2016
Representation ID: 2761
Received: 13/12/2016
Respondent: Seabeds Ltd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Effective
The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
UNSOUND Positively Prepared
1. The SCAAP document does not recognise the need for more parking spaces in the central area and fails to implement a policy to increase parking capacity particularly in the south central area (seafront). This is despite the Local Transport Plan3 stating demand for parking in the central area will increase by 25% in the next 4 years.
2. If adopted the transport section of the SCAAP will result in increased congestion and journey times.
Justified
3. I object to the use of the Car Parking Study produced by Steer Davies Gleave as it is flawed and based on Car parking surveys carried out in bad weather and on inaccurate, unreliable data from the council's VMS system. The parking report and surveys have underestimated the parking stock, particularly in the central area to the south of railway, and thus has underestimated the demand for spaces from visitors to the seafront. The surveys have been predominantly focused on the High Street thus the parking situation & demand to the south of the railway line has been misrepresented even though the southern area has been identified as the area which experiences the greatest pressure on its parking supply. The report relies on over 99% of data from the VMS system which is inaccurate and unreliable.
4. The SCAAP document and its Car Parking Survey fails to recognise that on many busy days the current car park network can't cope with demand.
Effective
5. The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
Consistent with National Policy
6. Policy DS5, by failing to deliver sufficient parking capacity, and by introducing sustainable transport measures will create congestion and have a major negative impact on my business. Customer by car will not be able to access and park in the central area and thus will not be able to or will make the choice not to visit the central area. The NPPF is clear that policies should contribute to building a strong responsive and competitive economy. The provision of infrastructure is vital to this and the plan should proactively meet the development demands of business. This plan will deter from economic growth as it does not allow for the growth in visitor numbers by car.
* The government recognises that different policies and measures will be required in different communities and opportunities to maximise sustainable transport solutions will vary. Due to large numbers of visitors coming to Southend by car and due to its geographical location and access routes measures such as bus lanes and cycle routes only add to congestion. The public transport system is not of a high quality and is unsuitable for families wishing to visit Southend from outside the area.
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Revised Proposed Submission 2016
Representation ID: 2765
Received: 13/12/2016
Respondent: Papillon
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Effective
The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Revised Proposed Submission 2016
Representation ID: 2770
Received: 13/12/2016
Respondent: Roses Restaurant
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Effective
The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Revised Proposed Submission 2016
Representation ID: 2775
Received: 13/12/2016
Respondent: southend rock & gifts
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Effective
The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Revised Proposed Submission 2016
Representation ID: 2780
Received: 13/12/2016
Respondent: Beaches Cafe Bar Bistro
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Effective
The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Revised Proposed Submission 2016
Representation ID: 2785
Received: 13/12/2016
Respondent: Falcon Public House
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Effective
The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
UNSOUND Positively Prepared
1. The SCAAP document does not recognise the need for more parking spaces in the central area and fails to implement a policy to increase parking capacity particularly in the south central area (seafront). This is despite the Local Transport Plan3 stating demand for parking in the central area will increase by 25% in the next 4 years.
2. If adopted the transport section of the SCAAP will result in increased congestion and journey times.
Justified
3. I object to the use of the Car Parking Study produced by Steer Davies Gleave as it is flawed and based on Car parking surveys carried out in bad weather and on inaccurate, unreliable data from the council's VMS system. The parking report and surveys have underestimated the parking stock, particularly in the central area to the south of railway, and thus has underestimated the demand for spaces from visitors to the seafront. The surveys have been predominantly focused on the High Street thus the parking situation & demand to the south of the railway line has been misrepresented even though the southern area has been identified as the area which experiences the greatest pressure on its parking supply. The report relies on over 99% of data from the VMS system which is inaccurate and unreliable.
4. The SCAAP document and its Car Parking Survey fails to recognise that on many busy days the current car park network can't cope with demand.
Effective
5. The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
Consistent with National Policy
6. Policy DS5, by failing to deliver sufficient parking capacity, and by introducing sustainable transport measures will create congestion and have a major negative impact on my business. Customer by car will not be able to access and park in the central area and thus will not be able to or will make the choice not to visit the central area. The NPPF is clear that policies should contribute to building a strong responsive and competitive economy. The provision of infrastructure is vital to this and the plan should proactively meet the development demands of business. This plan will deter from economic growth as it does not allow for the growth in visitor numbers by car.
1. The government recognises that different policies and measures will be required in different communities and opportunities to maximise sustainable transport solutions will vary. Due to large numbers of visitors coming to Southend by car and due to its geographical location and access routes measures such as bus lanes and cycle routes only add to congestion. The public transport system is not of a high quality and is unsuitable for families wishing to visit Southend from outside the area.
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Revised Proposed Submission 2016
Representation ID: 2789
Received: 13/12/2016
Respondent: Harry Levy
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Effective
The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
UNSOUND Positively Prepared
1. The SCAAP document does not recognise the need for more parking spaces in the central area and fails to implement a policy to increase parking capacity particularly in the south central area (seafront). This is despite the Local Transport Plan3 stating demand for parking in the central area will increase by 25% in the next 4 years.
2. If adopted the transport section of the SCAAP will result in increased congestion and journey times.
Justified
3. I object to the use of the Car Parking Study produced by Steer Davies Gleave as it is flawed and based on Car parking surveys carried out in bad weather and on inaccurate, unreliable data from the council's VMS system. The parking report and surveys have underestimated the parking stock, particularly in the central area to the south of railway, and thus has underestimated the demand for spaces from visitors to the seafront. The surveys have been predominantly focused on the High Street thus the parking situation & demand to the south of the railway line has been misrepresented even though the southern area has been identified as the area which experiences the greatest pressure on its parking supply. The report relies on over 99% of data from the VMS system which is inaccurate and unreliable.
4. The SCAAP document and its Car Parking Survey fails to recognise that on many busy days the current car park network can't cope with demand.
Effective
5. The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
Consistent with National Policy
6. Policy DS5, by failing to deliver sufficient parking capacity, and by introducing sustainable transport measures will create congestion and have a major negative impact on my business. Customer by car will not be able to access and park in the central area and thus will not be able to or will make the choice not to visit the central area. The NPPF is clear that policies should contribute to building a strong responsive and competitive economy. The provision of infrastructure is vital to this and the plan should proactively meet the development demands of business. This plan will deter from economic growth as it does not allow for the growth in visitor numbers by car.
7. The government recognises that different policies and measures will be required in different communities and opportunities to maximise sustainable transport solutions will vary. Due to large numbers of visitors coming to Southend by car and due to its geographical location and access routes measures such as bus lanes and cycle routes only add to congestion. The public transport system is not of a high quality and is unsuitable for families wishing to visit Southend from outside the area.
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Revised Proposed Submission 2016
Representation ID: 2793
Received: 13/12/2016
Respondent: Mr Roger Eary
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Effective
The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
UNSOUND Positively Prepared
1. The SCAAP document does not recognise the need for more parking spaces in the central area and fails to implement a policy to increase parking capacity particularly in the south central area (seafront). This is despite the Local Transport Plan3 stating demand for parking in the central area will increase by 25% in the next 4 years.
2. If adopted the transport section of the SCAAP will result in increased congestion and journey times.
Justified
3. I object to the use of the Car Parking Study produced by Steer Davies Gleave as it is flawed and based on Car parking surveys carried out in bad weather and on inaccurate, unreliable data from the council's VMS system. The parking report and surveys have underestimated the parking stock, particularly in the central area to the south of railway, and thus has underestimated the demand for spaces from visitors to the seafront. The surveys have been predominantly focused on the High Street thus the parking situation & demand to the south of the railway line has been misrepresented even though the southern area has been identified as the area which experiences the greatest pressure on its parking supply. The report relies on over 99% of data from the VMS system which is inaccurate and unreliable.
4. The SCAAP document and its Car Parking Survey fails to recognise that on many busy days the current car park network can't cope with demand.
Effective
5. The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
Consistent with National Policy
6. Policy DS5, by failing to deliver sufficient parking capacity, and by introducing sustainable transport measures will create congestion and have a major negative impact on my business. Customer by car will not be able to access and park in the central area and thus will not be able to or will make the choice not to visit the central area. The NPPF is clear that policies should contribute to building a strong responsive and competitive economy. The provision of infrastructure is vital to this and the plan should proactively meet the development demands of business. This plan will deter from economic growth as it does not allow for the growth in visitor numbers by car.
7. The government recognises that different policies and measures will be required in different communities and opportunities to maximise sustainable transport solutions will vary. Due to large numbers of visitors coming to Southend by car and due to its geographical location and access routes measures such as bus lanes and cycle routes only add to congestion. The public transport system is not of a high quality and is unsuitable for families wishing to visit Southend from outside the area.
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Revised Proposed Submission 2016
Representation ID: 2797
Received: 13/12/2016
Respondent: Mr Simon Stephens
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Effective
The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
UNSOUND Positively Prepared
1. The SCAAP document does not recognise the need for more parking spaces in the central area and fails to implement a policy to increase parking capacity particularly in the south central area (seafront). This is despite the Local Transport Plan3 stating demand for parking in the central area will increase by 25% in the next 4 years.
2. If adopted the transport section of the SCAAP will result in increased congestion and journey times.
Justified
3. I object to the use of the Car Parking Study produced by Steer Davies Gleave as it is flawed and based on Car parking surveys carried out in bad weather and on inaccurate, unreliable data from the council's VMS system. The parking report and surveys have underestimated the parking stock, particularly in the central area to the south of railway, and thus has underestimated the demand for spaces from visitors to the seafront. The surveys have been predominantly focused on the High Street thus the parking situation & demand to the south of the railway line has been misrepresented even though the southern area has been identified as the area which experiences the greatest pressure on its parking supply. The report relies on over 99% of data from the VMS system which is inaccurate and unreliable.
4. The SCAAP document and its Car Parking Survey fails to recognise that on many busy days the current car park network can't cope with demand.
Effective
5. The opportunity sites identified within the SCAAP would represent major developments which are not deliverable in 4 years.
Consistent with National Policy
6. Policy DS5, by failing to deliver sufficient parking capacity, and by introducing sustainable transport measures will create congestion and have a major negative impact on my business. Customer by car will not be able to access and park in the central area and thus will not be able to or will make the choice not to visit the central area. The NPPF is clear that policies should contribute to building a strong responsive and competitive economy. The provision of infrastructure is vital to this and the plan should proactively meet the development demands of business. This plan will deter from economic growth as it does not allow for the growth in visitor numbers by car.
7. The government recognises that different policies and measures will be required in different communities and opportunities to maximise sustainable transport solutions will vary. Due to large numbers of visitors coming to Southend by car and due to its geographical location and access routes measures such as bus lanes and cycle routes only add to congestion. The public transport system is not of a high quality and is unsuitable for families wishing to visit Southend from outside the area.