53. Do you agree with the suggested option?

Showing comments and forms 1 to 5 of 5

Support

Development Management Development Plan (DPD)

Representation ID: 485

Received: 03/08/2010

Respondent: Carole Mulroney

Representation Summary:

supported

Support

Development Management Development Plan (DPD)

Representation ID: 537

Received: 04/08/2010

Respondent: Cllr Burdett

Representation Summary:

DM14 - Very poor quality homes in some parts of Kursaal with dreadful overcrowding

Support

Development Management Development Plan (DPD)

Representation ID: 662

Received: 09/08/2010

Respondent: Adult & Community Services Southend-on-Sea Borough Council

Representation Summary:

Support the proposals to ensure all new dwellings meet Lifetime Homes Standards and mirror space standards as set out by HCA ensuring equality of choice for those entering market and affordable housing.

Comment

Development Management Development Plan (DPD)

Representation ID: 773

Received: 10/08/2010

Respondent: Burges Estate Residents Association

Representation Summary:

Page 56. The suggested option for protecting single storey dwellings could be strengthened by an Article 4 direction as put forward elsewhere for the sea front. The deletion of "deemed necessary" in the option would also help. It is doubtful whether further protection could be given to family accommodation as that is too broad a definition.

Comment

Development Management Development Plan (DPD)

Representation ID: 1019

Received: 20/10/2010

Respondent: Savills

Representation Summary:

In is not clear whether the preferred option relates to new build, not just new dwellings. It may be impossible to meet these standards if conversion of buildings to residential is pursued.