53. Do you agree with the suggested option?
Support
Development Management Development Plan (DPD)
Representation ID: 485
Received: 03/08/2010
Respondent: Carole Mulroney
supported
Support
Development Management Development Plan (DPD)
Representation ID: 537
Received: 04/08/2010
Respondent: Cllr Burdett
DM14 - Very poor quality homes in some parts of Kursaal with dreadful overcrowding
Support
Development Management Development Plan (DPD)
Representation ID: 662
Received: 09/08/2010
Respondent: Adult & Community Services Southend-on-Sea Borough Council
Support the proposals to ensure all new dwellings meet Lifetime Homes Standards and mirror space standards as set out by HCA ensuring equality of choice for those entering market and affordable housing.
Comment
Development Management Development Plan (DPD)
Representation ID: 773
Received: 10/08/2010
Respondent: Burges Estate Residents Association
Page 56. The suggested option for protecting single storey dwellings could be strengthened by an Article 4 direction as put forward elsewhere for the sea front. The deletion of "deemed necessary" in the option would also help. It is doubtful whether further protection could be given to family accommodation as that is too broad a definition.
Comment
Development Management Development Plan (DPD)
Representation ID: 1019
Received: 20/10/2010
Respondent: Savills
In is not clear whether the preferred option relates to new build, not just new dwellings. It may be impossible to meet these standards if conversion of buildings to residential is pursued.