Proposed Schedule of Modifications

Showing comments and forms 1 to 6 of 6

Comment

Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Schedule of Modifications to the Revised Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 2907

Received: 14/08/2017

Respondent: Anthony Nathan

Representation Summary:

Apart for the need to significantly simplify the wordiness of the document into a much simpler summary, it does seem a lot of work for little significant benefit.

Full text:

Apart for the need to significantly simplify the wordiness of the document into a much simpler summary, it does seem a lot of work for little significant benefit.

Comment

Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Schedule of Modifications to the Revised Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 2908

Received: 21/08/2017

Respondent: National Grid

Representation Summary:

National Grid has no comments to make in response to this consultation.

Full text:

National Grid has no comments to make in response to this consultation.

Support

Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Schedule of Modifications to the Revised Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 2909

Received: 19/09/2017

Respondent: Natural England

Representation Summary:

Natural England supports the minor modifications to the SCAPP. We have no further comments to make

Full text:

Natural England supports the minor modifications to the SCAPP. We have no further comments to make

Support

Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Schedule of Modifications to the Revised Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 2914

Received: 20/09/2017

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

We very much welcome many of the Proposed Modifications put forward by the Council particularly Main modifications 13, and Minor modifications 4, 17, 18. 42. These address many of our earlier concerns.

Full text:

We very much welcome many of the Proposed Modifications put forward by the Council particularly Main modifications 13, and Minor modifications 4, 17, 18. 42. These address many of our earlier concerns.

Comment

Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Schedule of Modifications to the Revised Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 2918

Received: 20/09/2017

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

We should like to stress that the above comments are based on the information provided by the Council in its consultation. To avoid any doubt, this does not affect our obligation to provide further advice and, potentially, object to specific proposals, which may subsequently arise where we consider that these would have an adverse effect upon the historic environment.

Full text:

We very much welcome many of the Proposed Modifications put forward by the Council particularly Main modifications 13, and Minor modifications 4, 17, 18. 42. These address many of our earlier concerns.

Object

Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Schedule of Modifications to the Revised Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 2924

Received: 22/09/2017

Respondent: Southend United Football Club (SUFC)

Representation Summary:

In support of representations made on behalf of Stockvale Group and Turnstone, our letter of the 14th July highlighted that policy CS1.2 was unsound as the delivery of a commercially viable cinema would not be able to achieve the policy requirement for no net loss in car parking provision. However, no modifications have been made regarding policy CS1.2. Therefore, I wish to re-emphasise that this policy should not be made as it is highly uncertain that a leisure focused development on the Seaways Car Park could be viably delivered during the SCAAP Plan period.

Full text:

The proposed wording of DS1.1 in the Schedule of Modifications replicates the proposed wording of SBP and IP in its entirety and therefore, on behalf of SUFC I wish to re-emphasise that the wording is unsound and re-submit our proposed wording. In support of representations made on behalf of Stockvale Group and Turnstone, our letter of the 14th July highlighted that policy CS1.2 was unsound as the delivery of a commercially viable cinema would not be able to achieve the policy requirement for no net loss in car parking provision. However, no modifications have been made regarding policy CS1.2. Therefore, I wish to re-emphasise that this policy should not be made as it is highly uncertain that a leisure focused development on the Seaways Car Park could be viably delivered during the SCAAP Plan period.