95. Do you agree with the suggested option?

Support

Representation ID: 467

Received: 02/08/2010

Respondent: Highways Agency

Promotion of modal shift from private car to more sustainable means of transport including the promotion of travel planning.

Support

Representation ID: 498

Received: 03/08/2010

Respondent: Carole Mulroney

support

Comment

Representation ID: 774

Received: 10/08/2010

Respondent: Burges Estate Residents Association

Page 90. Mobility management policies are not about reducing reliance on the car but reducing the attractiveness of the car. Consequently the suggested option 3 makes no mention of parking provision in development proposals and is short sighted as a long term strategy. The management policy is at odds with the requirement to make Southend more attractive to tourists (day trippers or longer term) and shoppers when there are so many more accessible choices.

Comment

Representation ID: 787

Received: 10/08/2010

Respondent: Iceni Projects

Issue DM26 - Sustainable Transport Management: The proposed approach fails to address the potential for improvements to the strategic transport infrastructure network that could be accommodated through growth in the north of the borough.

Support

Representation ID: 1054

Received: 20/10/2010

Respondent: Savills

We support the full range of measures included in the preferred option.