4.7 Do you have any other issues/comments you would like to raise

Forgot to say that whilst we have been proactive in creating cyclepaths etc we have minimal facilities/ provision of hire bikes etc to encourage utilisation following departure of The Comfy Saddle

Encourage train travel & bike riding rather than cars like Cambridge and Oxford

Everyone I've ever met (I'm 60 this year) that has been to Southend loves the seafront. Keep parking & the route from both town centre rail stations as simple & accessible as possible

Tourism needs to be a key focus for promoting Southend and this should include redevelopment of the Pier which lacks attractions at the end. A hotel or leisure facility on the seafront would also bring in a new type of visitor and encourage them to stay overnight which will bring additional revenues to restaurants and local businesses.

The resort facilities are important but they do spread wealth particularly as av wages tend to be low

RDC does not have any specific comments to make on Southend’s tourism aspirations; however it would support further discussion over how these aspirations can complement and support those of Rochford District, including by promoting rural tourism opportunities and access to the countryside. RDC would encourage Southend to continue to engage positively over the growth and vitality of the regionally important London Southend Airport to consider the opportunities it presents to grow the tourism offer of the whole region.

The pier and Kursaal need to be enhanced for tourism. The main key is to look at alternative transport systems to avoid the traffic chaos that is a regular occurrence in the season and must put potential visitors off. Instead of looking at new developments make the most of what we have. Look at what successful seaside towns have done.

Have a park and ride scheme built into the new town development at Fossetts farm once a new link road is built, and a public transport link to the town centre and seafront from there,

Focus on the cultural offer - ensure our galleries are given the support to do the work the likes of Turner Contemporary does in Margate, Towner Gallery does in Eastbourne and Jerwood Gallery does in Hastings - more promotion, raise profile, additional funding. Cultural regeneration and artist relocation brings tourism and investment.

To become a leading coastal tourism destination Southend needs to compete with a number of well established destinations. Southend lacks an iconic viewing attraction that many other resorts have. The local plan could help address this by allocating a site for the development of a landmark viewing tower such as the Briton I360 or the Portsmouth spinnaker.

the text and slides attached, introduces the Metrotidal Lower Thames Orbital and forms the Metrotidal Limited submission and response to the Southend Local Plan consultations, to support the aims and objectives of the local plan while offering an alternative approach to deliverability with a view to generating greater benefits. Deliverability is likely to extend beyond the local plan period, so the proposals raise a question of safeguarding to enable delivery as part of the long term objectives of the Southend 2050 plan.
Set out below are some initial responses to the 12No. Local Plan section headings of the consultations:-
Our Vision
Metrotidal Limited supports the key messages in Box 1 of the Southend 2050 plan.
Spatial Strategy
1.4 – Metrotidal Limited supports Option 3, i.e. Option 2 + working with neighbouring authorities. The Metrotidal proposal would mitigate any local loss of greenbelt and greenfield land by providing much improved access to greenbelt and greenfield land on the routes of the rail orbital and Sustrans cycle networks across the Lower Thames and Medway estuaries. Furthermore, the new connectivity supports an integrated and co-ordinated approach to existing and new housing developments across the Lower Thames Estuary while providing the resilience of alternative routes across the estuary and into Central London.
Housing
2.1(b), 2.3, 2.4, 2.7. The Metrotidal proposal supports both increased housing supply at public transport and town centre locations including land released by redevelopment of the Southend Victoria terminus as well as the potential of the “Sector D “ Fossets Farm, Garon Park and Bournes Green Chase area, with access from Southend Airport Station.
Securing a Thriving Local Economy
3.7 The Metrotidal proposal creates an orbital line for the Lower Thames Estuary, bringing together new markets and opportunities for Southend in terms of outward connectivity and inward investment. The Medway Towns are currently up to 2-hours away but at a distance of only 20km. The Metrotidal Lower Thames Orbital brings South Essex and North Kent within a 30 minute journey, creating a single economy larger than Manchester.
Promoting Southend as a Major Resort
4. The Metrotidal proposal supports Southend as an exemplar coastal tourism destination within the UK. The sea defence system becomes itself a major tourist attraction. The proposals include a high-quality marina development with a cruise liner terminal and Thames Clipper ferry landings all served by a Thames Estuary Station, enhancing Southend as a gateway for national and international tourism. The marina, cruise liner terminal and ferry landings complement the original development of the pier as a tourist gateway to Southend. The integrated transport connections, including the rail links to Southend Airport, Ebbsfleet and Central London, provide an attractive tourist offer and radically improve access to the Southend conurbation.
Providing for Vibrant and Attractive Town Centres
5.6 The Metrotidal proposal supports the regeneration of the town centre for the 21st century with a new Southend Central underground station linking the existing lines while releasing the Southend Victoria terminus site for redevelopment.
Providing for a Sustainable Transport System
6.6 The Metrotidal proposals promote green-growth across the Lower Thames estuary by including a floating solar array and wind turbines to generate renewable energy for the railway orbital and tunnel M+E systems along with an efficient data storage and distribution system.
Facilitating Good Design and Healthy Living
7.5 The Metrotidal Lower Thames Orbital provides ready access to the wide open spaces of the Thames and Medway estuaries.
Providing Community Services and Infrastructure
8.4 The Metrotidal proposals contribute to improved broadband infrastructure and connectivity.

Enhancing our Natural Environment
9.3 As noted above The Metrotidal Lower Thames Orbital provides ready access to the wide open spaces of the Thames and Medway estuaries.
Planning for Climate Change
10.1 The Metrotidal proposal protects the full length of the Thames tideway upstream with a system that is only 8km long.
Ensuring that the Local Plan is Delivered
12.5 The Metrotidal proposal for integrated infrastructure enables overall costs to be reduced while increasing the net economic benefits. Municipal Railway Bonds and other innovative funding initiatives replace conventional public/private sector funding sources to restore the co-ordination of railway and land development that had contributed to the growth of Southend in the 19th and 20th centuries.

Section 1: Vision and strategy for the future
Southend needs to “Up its Game” if it is to prosper and grow in the future. It has assets which need to be further exploited and grown so that it can accommodate future population growth painlessly to the benefit of all of its people and businesses. It is unlikely that more of the same will work in the coming years. As there is no single group that can achieve this result, Southend council need to be leaders of this process. To achieve an optimum result, the council needs dynamic partnership with its people and businesses. Further, all its assets, people and location need to be exploited to achieve the best possible result. When unforeseen problems occur, as they undoubtedly will, they must be dealt with rapidly and in the short and long term interests of its entire people.
I suggest our objectives for the future should be:
Southend to be: prosperous, healthy, well educated in appropriate skills for the future, accessible from the rest of the UK and Europe, a major tourist destination, a safe environment for all, reduced atmospheric pollution and with no flooding risk from the sea and rainfall.
Southend has some excellent assets. It is a seaside location with about 7 miles of coastline. In addition to “bucket and spade tourism”, we need our beaches to be well advertised be fully exploited. Considering other tourism, the Cliffs Pavilion provides shows and concerts. Southend yacht clubs and Kite surfing are popular. Southend has a plethora of restaurants and entertainment.
Unfortunately it lacks world class road access and parking, although, uniquely for a town of its size, it has two main line railways, historically very popular with tourists. One section of the foreshore is out of bounds to residents and others as it is believed there is unexploded ordnance under the beach. The Ministry of Defence seems to be unwilling to confirm the level of risk or remove unexploded ordnance. This problem needs to be dealt with.
To achieve sustained success, for residents and visitors, our road access to the rest of the UK needs to be significantly improved. Southend, like many other towns and cities, is overwhelmed by road traffic. For the future, it is essential to discourage the use of cars and to ensure cars are replaced by minimum polluting alternatives giving a high public service. Currently, car and coach parking need to be sufficient to match current and future tourism until satisfactory alternative arrangements are available. Should high value businesses coupled with entrepreneurship be attracted to Southend, it seems likely that Southend could be very successful. Currently we have only one major business of this calibre
In addition to needing easy access from the UK and Europe, we need to improve our local public transport and create a bus station on the lines of the Preston (Lancashire) bus station, and Harrogate and Bath bus stations. A link is necessary between the pier and the local airport. A tramway, though expensive, running down the High Street will be beneficial for tourism and trade. The council and the rail and bus companies need to work together to encourage people to visit Southend from Leigh to Shoeburyness and to make East beach a premier destination.

Considering Shoebury (the wards of West Shoebury and Shoeburyness) national surveys indicate that Shoebury has a relatively low standard of health and income. Shoebury for years has been the poor relation of the rest of the borough. This needs to be changed. A raised standard of life, health, education and aspiration is essential for the future Shoebury to prosper in the future. Businesses tend to stay away from Shoebury because of access problems. Adequate high speed roads are needed to make Shoebury an attractive location. The ideal solution is a new motorway to the M25 which will potentially benefit the whole of Southend and the communities to the north of Southend, for example, Great Wakering.

As our major land asset is our beaches, we have the longest pleasure pier in the world and lots of eating places. We need to implement a plan to make Southend the best destination for tourists in South East England. We are close to a large population centre in east London.

New home delivery:
We understand that central government needs Southend to accommodate a further 80,000 houses.
Whilst Option 1 seems to be the ideal one, there is insufficient space within the current boundaries of Southend to match government’s requirement.
Option 3 seems to be the only one that could work. This is likely to change Southend, and to be unacceptable for current residents. It is unlikely that Essex County Council will agree make land available to Southend for 80,000 homes without the UK government compelling them to do so.
Employers are hesitant to locate in Southend because of its poor road links. This is likely to mean that Southend is likely to be a magnet for people with low incomes living in “affordable homes” should Southend be able to provide them.

The current infrastructure is challenged whenever there is very heavy rain and high tides. Additional homes will need more land that will be increasingly susceptible to flooding without significant raising of sea walls. The risk of flooding will be increased by isostatic readjustment.
It seems that Southend council will be in a trap if the UK Government insists on a further 80,000 homes in the current borders of Southend and will not be able to meet its current aspirations for its current people nor its future.

Spatial Development
Option 3 is the preferred solution for spatial development. Densifying areas can lead to the use of mechanical ventilation systems to protect residents from noise, rather than the ability for residents to control their own environment. This approach allows for the building of mixed housing types to meet different needs, sustainable developments and in the required infrastructure to support additional housing.

Housing
Where permitted development of office blocks, plus conversions and extensions are being built the opportunity should be taken to having design criteria which will mitigate ventilation issues and noise transmission.

With respect to Contaminated Land the Council’s contaminated land strategy will seek to set out how the Council will identify contaminated land in the borough in a rational, ordered and efficient manner. Where contaminated land is identified, the Council is required to ensure that any associated risks to human health and/or to the wider environment are addressed in an appropriate and cost effective manner. It is good practice to undertake investigation of any proposed Local Plan allocations as a priority within this contaminated land investigation strategy. This is to ensure that no development gives rise to or triggers unacceptable levels of pollution and land instability that could impact on human health, property and the wider environment including environmental designations. The Council will ensure that consideration is given to adopting environmental best practice measures in all cases.

The presence of contamination may affect or restrict the use of land, but equally development may address the issue for the benefit of the wider community, and bring the land back into beneficial use. The presence of instability in land can also be a major planning issue, and when new development is proposed it will be necessary to ensure that new buildings and their surroundings are safe for future users as well as ensure that their development does not have an effect on the immediate and surrounding area including neighbouring uses. In determining whether land contamination or instability is an issue when assessing a planning application, the Council will have regard to a range of information sources including its database of past industrial and commercial land uses, information provided by developers and third parties, statutory guidance and historic maps. In the case of development, where the use would be particularly vulnerable to contamination evidence should always be required to establish whether there is any concern about contamination which will need to be addressed.

Where the Council supports the redevelopment of the poorest quality employment sites for other uses such as Housing, consideration needs to be given to the environmental impact on residents of all socio-economic groups. See comments above under 2.7 with respect to noise, ventilation and contaminated land.

Improvements may be required to the sewer / drainage capacity for new developments, particularly those around the seafront, including dealing with misconnections. Ensuring the sufficient of sewer / drainage capacity for new developments and targeting and support agencies with responsibility for misconnections will improve the water quality and the objective of promoting Southend as a major resort.

Support the enhancement of tree planning and landscaping to both improve the public realm and providing a greener and cooler community.
Support the improvement of all transport systems serving Southend will help to improve air quality and social mobility. Where improvements to the main A127 and A13 increases the number of lanes consideration will need to be given to mitigation for existing residents and new developments to reduce the impact of noise and vibration and reduced air quality.

The introduction of Park and Ride Schemes would encourage the use of public transport.
Consideration to be given to green energy solutions, such as energy networks and solar panels to meet the energy needs of new developments, and the retrofitting of existing developments.
Agree that working in partnership will help to deliver the required outcomes, consideration should also be given to increasing the CIL charges, set out in the infrastructure delivery plan that supports local plans.

.