71. Do you agree with the suggested option?
Support
Development Management Development Plan (DPD)
Representation ID: 1027
Received: 20/10/2010
Respondent: Savills
Although we support the policy to resist the loss of A1 retail uses in primary shopping frontages, the appropriate level on non- retail frontage should not be a borough-wide figure in the DMDPD.
Comment
Development Management Development Plan (DPD)
Representation ID: 1028
Received: 20/10/2010
Respondent: Savills
The appropriate level of retail and non-retail use in each of the identified primary and secondary shopping frontages should also be informed the Southend-on-Sea Retail Study, which is yet to be completed.
Comment
Development Management Development Plan (DPD)
Representation ID: 1029
Received: 20/10/2010
Respondent: Savills
The primary and secondary frontages need to be identified on a map base in the Submission Draft CAAP and other relevant LDDs, including development briefs for individual sites. These documents should include appropriate levels of retail and non-retail use for each of the identified primary and secondary shopping frontages.