Site map

• Consultations
• Login
• Register
• Accessibility
• Privacy
• Cookies
• Instructions
• Historic documents
• • Local Plan - Refining the Options July 2021
  • Representation search for Local Plan - Refining the Options July 2021
  • • Part 1. Aims and Objectives
    • • Representations made against Aims and Objectives General Comments
      • Representations made against 1a: Do you agree with the draft Aim for the Southend New Local Plan, setting out where we want to be in 20 years’ time? Please explain your answer.
      • Representations made against 1b: Do you agree with the draft Development Principles? Please explain your answer.
      • Representations made against 1c: Do you agree with the draft Spatial Objectives? Please explain your answer.
    • Part 2. Spatial Strategy
    • • Representations made against 2.1a: Do you agree with the employment sites proposed to be safeguarded as set out in Table 2 and Map 2? Please reference the site.
      • Representations made against 2.1b: Do you agree with the identified potential new employment sites as set out in Table 3 and Map 2? Please reference the site.
      • Representations made against 2.1d: Do you agree with how we plan to meet employment needs? Please explain your answer.
      • Representations made against 2.2a: Do you agree that new infrastructure and community services should be delivered as part of the phasing of new development? Are there any infrastructure types we should prioritise due to current capacity issues if so, what are these?
      • Representations made against 2.1 General Comments
      • Representations made against 2.2 General Comments
      • Representations made against 2.3 - General Comments
    • Part 3. Neighbourhoods
    • • Representations made against Neighbourhoods - General Comments
    • Duty to Cooperate Responses
  • Southend Statement of Community Involvement
  • Representation search for Southend Statement of Community Involvement
  • • The Southend Statement of Community Involvement
    • • Representations made against Introduction
      • Representations made against General Principles of planning consultations
      • Representations made against Planning Policy Consultation Database
      • Representations made against Supplementary Planning Documents
      • Representations made against Neighbourhood Plans and Development Orders
      • Representations made against 15. Community Infrastructure Levy
      • Representations made against Planning Applications
      • Representations made against Independent Planning Advice
  • Issues and Options Supporting Documents
  • Representation search for Issues and Options Supporting Documents
  • • Southend New Local Plan - non-technical summary
    • Integrated Impact Assessment
  • New Local Plan
  • Representation search for New Local Plan
  • • What is a Local Plan
    • Introduction
    • SECTION 1 - A VISION FOR CHANGE
    • Issue 1: Our Vision & Strategy for the Future - Questions
    • • Representations made against 1. What would you like Southend to be in the future
      • Representations made against 1.1 Is there anything missing from the key messages (Figure 8), and why should it be included
      • Representations made against 1.2 Do you disagree with any of the key messages (Figure 8), if so which ones and why
      • Representations made against 1.3 If you were to prioritise 5 of the key messages (Figure 8), what would these be?
      • Representations made against 1.4 How should Southend develop in the future in seeking to deliver 18,000 - 24,000 new homes and 10,000 - 12,000 new jobs, please select from one of the options stating your reasoning.
      • Representations made against 1.5 Please let us know if you believe there is another option on how Southend should develop in the future.
    • SECTION 2 - PLANNING FOR GROWTH & CHANGE
    • Issue 2: Housing - Questions
    • • Representations made against 2. How best do you think we should provide for our future housing needs
      • Representations made against 2.1 Intensify housing development by: a) allowing an increase of densities across the existing built up area or
      • Representations made against 2.2 Allow redevelopment of some of the poorer quality industrial areas and/or allow some sites currently zoned for employment to be developed for housing? What sites do you think should be identified
      • Representations made against 2.3 Allow housing development on land not currently built on, such as agricultural land, open space (excluding parks & coastline) & land at Fossetts Farm? What sites do you think should be identified
      • Representations made against 2.4
      • Representations made against 2.5 How might the local plan be more responsive to the needs of younger people, older people and custom/ self-builders
      • Representations made against 2.6
      • Representations made against 2.7 Do you have any other issues/comments you would like to raise
    • Issue 3: Securing a Thriving Local Economy - Questions
    • • Representations made against 3. How best do you think we can retain and promote employment in Southend
      • Representations made against 3.1 Should we focus new jobs to the town centre, London Southend Airport and associated Business Park and the northern Southend corridor, including Temple Farm and Stock Road
      • Representations made against 3.2 Should we concentrate on promoting digital, cultural and creative industries; healthcare technology; advanced manufacturing and engineering; and tourism sectors
      • Representations made against 3.3 Should we continue to focus new office development in the town centre
      • Representations made against 3.4 Should we continue to support improvement and re-use of existing allocated employment sites that are suited for continued employment use
      • Representations made against 3.5 Should we allow redevelopment of the poorest quality employment sites for other uses such as housing
      • Representations made against 3.7 Do you have any other issues/comments you would like to raise
      • Representations made against 3.6
    • Issue 4: Promoting Southend as a Major Resort - Questions
    • • Representations made against 4. How best do you think we can enhance the visitor offer in Southend to make it Englands leading coastal tourism destination
      • Representations made against 4.1 Allocate and promote new sites for additional tourism/leisure developments in the central seafront area or elsewhere in the Borough. Where do you think these should be focussed
      • Representations made against 4.2 Promote further hotel and tourist accommodation. Should this continue to be directed to areas in the town centre, seafront and airport or should other areas be promoted
      • Representations made against 4.3 Promote the second phase of City Beach and enhanced public realm areas. Should priority for City Beach be given to the areas east of the Pier adjacent the Kursaal or west of the Pier
      • Representations made against 4.4 Improve accessibility to the central seafront areas for all users. How best do you think this could be achieved
      • Representations made against 4.5 Seek further enhanced links between the central seafront and town centre to improve services and facilities. How best do you think this could be achieved
      • Representations made against 4.6 Continue to safeguard Key Visitor Car Parking in line with the provisions of the Southend Central Area Action Plan
      • Representations made against 4.7 Do you have any other issues/comments you would like to raise
    • Issue 5:Providing for Vibrant and Attractive Town Centres - Questions
    • • Representations made against 5. How best can we ensure that our town centres are successful, vibrant and attractive places in the face of changing retail demands
      • Representations made against 5.1
      • Representations made against 5.2 Review the role and function of Southend town centre to provide for a more flexible approach to development schemes? For example:
      • Representations made against 5.3 Do you think the current town centre boundary (see SCAAP) should be amended Should we allow more residential uses on the periphery
      • Representations made against 5.4 Do you think the Westcliif and Leigh shopping centres should continue in their current formats or do you think there should be changes
      • Representations made against 5.5 Encourage and promote further enhancements to the public realm, such as improved paving, seating, tree planting and landscaping. What do you think the priorities should be and where
      • Representations made against 5.6 Do you have any other issues/comments you would like to raise
    • Issue 6: Providing for a Sustainable Transport System - Questions
    • • Representations made against 6. How best do you think we can improve the transport system serving Southend
      • Representations made against 6.1 Seek to make further improvements to the A127. What do you think these should be
      • Representations made against 6.2 What do you think should be done to create improved access if a new settlement is built north of Fossetts Farm, Garon Park and Bournes Green Chase (see figure 9)
      • Representations made against 6.3
      • Representations made against 6.4 Provide for park and ride facilities to serve Southend. Where do you think these should be and in what format
      • Representations made against 6.5 How do you think technologies such as the internet, electric and driverless cars will affect how we travel by 2038
      • Representations made against 6.6 Do you have any other issues/comments
    • SECTION 3 - CREATING GOOD QUALITY & HEALTHY PLACES
    • Issue 7: Facilitating Good Design, Healthy Living and Built Heritage - Questions
    • • Representations made against 7. How best do we ensure healthy communities and development is appropriate and of a quality design, whilst ensuring we enhance our built heritage assets
      • Representations made against 7.1 Continue to promote improved and new areas of public realm. Do you think priorities should be established as to where this should take place
      • Representations made against 7.2 Require high quality landscape design and tree planting in new developments. Do you think priorities should be established as to which areas of the borough should be subject to streetscape upgradi
      • Representations made against 7.3
      • Representations made against 7.4 Do you believe there are additional areas that should be protected as Conservation Areas
      • Representations made against 7.5 Do you have any other issues/ comments
    • Issue 8: Providing Community Services and Infrastructure - Questions
    • • Representations made against 8. How best can we provide for our future community needs to secure a sustained high quality of life and well-being having regard to future growth
      • Representations made against 8.1 Are there any specific issues regarding educational provision that you consider need to be addressed with respect to new development
      • Representations made against 8.2 How do you consider that health issues should be addressed in the Local Plan. How can new development encourage healthy lifestyles
      • Representations made against 8.3 Should we require open space and play areas as part of new development schemes. Do you think in appropriate cases this could be provided in an offsite location
      • Representations made against 8.4 As part of planning approvals should we ensure that all developments deliver quality broadband infrastructure and connectivity
      • Representations made against 8.5 Do you have any other issues/comments
    • Issue 9: Enhancing Our Natural Environment and Heritage - Questions
    • • Representations made against 9. How best do we protect and enhance our environment in the face of increasing growth and development pressures
      • Representations made against 9.1 Work with other stakeholders, funding bodies and developers to identify opportunities to promote and enhance the natural environment, and incorporate net gains for biodiversity in new development
      • Representations made against 9.2 Seek to enhance the boroughs network of green infrastructure using developer contributions for the management of green and open spaces and introduction of pocket parks
      • Representations made against 9.3
      • Representations made against 9.4 Do you have any other issues/comments
    • Issue 10: Planning for Climate Change - Questions
    • • Representations made against 10. How best do we plan for the future impacts of climate change
      • Representations made against 10.1 Should we develop local planning policies for the development of new or renewed sea defences
      • Representations made against 10.2 Require mitigation and adaptation measures to deal with the increase in average temperatures and greater rainfall, including tree planting and urban greening
      • Representations made against 10.3 Support renewable and low carbon energy schemes, including photovoltaic (PV) panels, biomass plants and electric vehicle charging points
      • Representations made against 10.4 Develop a local standard for decentralised energy generation in new development that is more ambitious than national targets?
      • Representations made against 10.5 Should we balance the need to retain the best and most versatile agricultural land for food security against future needs for housing and local services
      • Representations made against 10.6 Do you have any other issues/comments
    • SECTION 4 - SOUTHEND'S NEIGHBOURHOODS
    • Issue 11: Southend's Neighbourhoods - Questions
    • • Representations made against 11.1 What do you think are the key issues facing the neighbourhoods in the Borough
      • Representations made against 11.2 What do think are the possible options available for resolving these issues
    • SECTION 5 - DELIVERABILITY & IMPLEMENTATION
    • Issue 12: Ensuring that the New Local Plan is Delivered - Questions
    • • Representations made against 12. How best do you think the Local Plan can be effectively delivered in the face of limited resources
      • Representations made against 12.1 Continue to work in partnership with the private, public and voluntary sector plus neighbouring authorities to secure funding for key infrastructure projects
      • Representations made against 12.2 Set out priorities for project delivery. What do think these priorities should be and how should any phasing be applied
      • Representations made against 12.3 Increase the Community Infrastructure Levy tariffs to fund future projects
      • Representations made against 12.4 Through Garden Communities key principles ensure land value capture and long term stewardship for the benefit of the community, to provide and coordinate the necessary infrastructure
      • Representations made against 12.5 Do you have any other issues/comments
  • User Research Plan 2018
  • Representation search for User Research Plan 2018
  • • Section 1
    • Section 2
    • • Representations made against Q1 - Do you agree with the wording of Policy UR1 as set out above? Would it be more appropriate to follow the Essex Design Guide, rather than having Southend specific design principles?
      • Representations made against Q7 Do you agree with the wording Policy UR7 as set out above? UR7 (5) suggests that reliance upon on-street parking can be considered appropriate where there is demonstrable on-street parking capacity
    • Appendix 1: Marketing and Market Demand Evidence
    • Appendix 2: Vehicle Parking Standards
    • Appendix 3: Replaced Saved Planning Policies
    • Appendix 4: List of Abbreviations
  • Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Schedule of Modifications to the Revised Proposed Submission
  • Representation search for Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Schedule of Modifications to the Revised Proposed Submission
  • • Proposed Schedule of Modifications
  • Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Revised Proposed Submission 2016
  • Representation search for Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Revised Proposed Submission 2016
  • • Part A - The Plan and its Context
    • Part B - Development Strategy
    • Part C - Policy Areas and Site Allocations
    • Part D - Implementation and Monitoring Framework
    • Appendices
    • Proposals Map
  • Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
  • Representation search for Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
  • • Part A - The Plan and its Context
    • • Representations made against Question 1: Do you have any comments regarding the Sustainability Appraisal?
      • Representations made against Question 2: Do you have any comments on the Policies Map?
      • Representations made against Question 3: Do you agree with the proposed 'Vision' set out above? Please explain your answer.
      • Representations made against Question 4: Do you agree with the 'Strategic Objectives' set out above? Please explain your answer.
    • Part B - Development Strategy
    • • Representations made against Question 5: Do you agree with the proposed Central Area Strategy set out above? Please explain your answer
      • Representations made against Question 6: Do you agree with the proposed approach to maintaining a prosperous retail centre? Please explain your answer.
      • Representations made against Question 7: Which of the three Policy Options do you prefer? Please specify why you consider that this approach is best suited for managing primary shopping frontages within the town centre. Or do y
      • Representations made against Question 8: Do you agree with the proposed approach to employment development as set out within the plan? Please explain your answer.
      • Representations made against Question 9: Do you think it would be relevant & effective to allocate major residential planning permissions (10 units or more) within the SCAAP as illustrated in App 7&8 as proposal site
      • Representations made against Question 10: Do you agree with the proposed approach to residential development within Southend Central Area? Please explain your answer.
      • Representations made against Question 11: Do you agree with the proposed approach to culture, leisure, tourism and recreation? Please explain your answer.
      • Representations made against Question 12: Do you agree with the proposed approach to management of the historic environment in Southend Central Area? Please explain your answer.
      • Representations made against Question 13:Do you agree with the proposed approach to open and green space provision in Southend Central Area? Please explain your answer.
      • Representations made against Question 14: Do you agree with the proposed approach to the management of Key Views in Southend Central Area? Please explain your answer.
      • Representations made against Question 15: Do you agree with the proposed approach to landmarks / landmark buildings in Southend Central Area? Please explain your answer.
      • Representations made against Question 16: Do you agree with the proposed approach to flood risk management and sustainable drainage in Southend Central Area? Please explain your answer..
      • Representations made against Question 17: Do you agree with the proposed approach to the management of transport, access an the public realm in Southend Central Area? Please explain your answer.
      • Representations made against Question 18: Do you agree with the proposed approach with providing infrastructure in Southend Central Area? Please explain your answer.
    • Part C - Policy Areas and Site Allocations
    • • Representations made against Question 19: Do you agree with the indicative dwelling capacity as set out in Table 5? Please provide evidence to support your answer
      • Representations made against Question 20: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the High Street Policy Area? Please explain your answer. If you consider that the timescales for delivering developm
      • Representations made against Question 21: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the London Road Policy Area? Please explain your answer. If you consider that the timescale for delivering OS15 shou
      • Representations made against Question 22: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Elmer Square Policy Area and Opportunity Site 3: Elmer Square? Please explain your answer.
      • Representations made against Question 23: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Queensway Policy Area and Opportunity Site 4: Queensway? Please explain your answer.
      • Representations made against Question 24:Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Warrior Square Policy Area and Opportunity Site 5: Warrior Square? Please explain your answer
      • Representations made against Question 25: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Clifftown Policy Area? Please explain your answer.
      • Representations made against Question 26: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Tylers Policy Area and Opportunity Site 6: Tylers Avenue? Please explain your answer.
      • Representations made against Question 27: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Central Seafront Policy Area and sites OS7, OS8, OS9 and CS1.1? Please explain your answer.
      • Representations made against Question 28: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing nature conservation and biodiversity within the Central Seafront Policy Area? Please explain your answer.
      • Representations made against Question 29: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing the waterfront? Please explain your answer.
      • Representations made against Question 30:Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Victoria Avenue Gateway Neighbourhood Policy Area? Please explain your answer.
      • Representations made against Question 31: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Sutton Gateway Neighbourhood Policy Area? Please explain your answer.
    • Part D - Implementation and Monitoring Framework
    • • Representations made against Question 32: Do you agree with the indicative phasing of development within the SCAAP area? If not, please explain your answer
      • Representations made against Question 33: Do you think it will be useful to include indicative figures for potential new development within this section of the Plan? Please explain your answer
      • Representations made against Question 34: Do you think that it will be useful to include a series of projects and tasks within the Plan to help identify funding levels and co-ordination for delivery?
      • Representations made against Question 35: Do you agree with the overall approach outlined for the Implementation Plan? If you have any suggestions or amendments to the approach or another approach please specify and give your rea
      • Representations made against Question 36: Do you agree with the approach outlining how the SCAAP will monitor the delivery of policies and proposals?
      • Representations made against Question 37: Do you have any other general and further comments on this document?
    • Appendices
  • Statement of Modifications CIL Draft Charging Schedule
  • Representation search for Statement of Modifications CIL Draft Charging Schedule
  • • Statement of Modifications - CIL Draft Charging Schedule
  • CIL - Section 3 and Section 6
  • Representation search for CIL - Section 3 and Section 6
  • • CIL Section 3 and Section 6
  • Development Management DPD - Proposed Schedule of Modifications to the Submission Document
  • Representation search for Development Management DPD - Proposed Schedule of Modifications to the Submission Document
  • • Proposed Schedule of Modifications
  • Community Infrastructure Levy - Draft Charging Schedule (Nov 2014)
  • Representation search for Community Infrastructure Levy - Draft Charging Schedule (Nov 2014)
  • • Section 1 - Introduction
    • • Representations made against 1.1
    • Section 2 - Scope of CIL Charges
    • Section 3 - CIL
    • • Representations made against 3.1
    • Section 4 - CIL Collection and Spending
    • Section 5 - Monitoring, Reporting and Review of CIL
    • Section 6 - Comments, Responses and Next Steps
    • Appendix 1 - Examples of how liabilities are calculated
    • Appendix 2 - Regulation 123 Infrastructure List (Draft)
    • Appendix 3 - CIL Instalment Policy (Draft)
    • Appendix 4 - Draft Payment in Kind and Infrastructure Payments Policy
  • Planning Obligations - A Guide to Section 106 and Developer Contributions 2014 (SPD2)
  • Representation search for Planning Obligations - A Guide to Section 106 and Developer Contributions 2014 (SPD2)
  • • Section 1 - Introduction
    • Section 2 - Southend Borough Council's Approach to Planning Obligations
    • Section 3 - Procedure for Completing Planning Obligations
    • • Representations made against 3.1
    • Section 4 - Frequently Asked Questions
    • Appendix 1 - List of relevant national and local planning polcies and other guidance
    • Appendix 2 - Procedure for negotiating, preparing and completing a Legal Agreement
    • Appendix 3 - Useful contacts and information
    • Appendix 4 - Glossary
  • Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL)
  • Representation search for Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL)
  • • Section 1 - Introduction
    • Section 2 - Evidence
    • Section 3 - Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule
    • • Representations made against Question 3
      • Representations made against Question 4
      • Representations made against Question 5
    • Section 4 - Implementing CIL
    • • Representations made against Question 6
      • Representations made against Question 8
      • Representations made against Question 10
      • Representations made against Question 11
    • Section 5 - Monitoring, Reporting and Review of CIL
    • Section 6 - Comments, Response and Next Steps
    • Appendix 1
    • Appendix 2
    • Appendix 3
  • Development Management DPD - Revised Proposed Submission
  • Representation search for Development Management DPD - Revised Proposed Submission
  • • Section 1 - Introduction
    • • Representations made against Local Development Framework
      • Representations made against Sustainability Appraisal
    • Section 2 - National Planning Policy
    • Section 3 - Design and Townscape
    • Section 4 - The Seafront
    • Section 5 - Housing
    • Section 6 - Economic Development
    • Section 7 - Environmental Management
    • Section 8 - Sustainable Transport Management
    • • Representations made against Policy DM15 - Sustainable Transport Management
    • DM - Policies Map 2014
    • Appendix 1 - Monitoring Framework
    • Appendix 2 - Southend-on-Sea Core Strategy Objectives
    • Appendix 3 - Southend-on-Sea Core Strategy Policies
    • Appendix 4 - Marketing and Market Demand Evidence
    • Appendix 5 - Hierarchy and Potential Uses
    • Appendix 6 - Vehicle Parking Standards
    • Appendix 7 - Primary Shopping Frontages
    • Appendix 8 - Replaced Saved Policies
    • Appendix 9 - List Abbreviations
  • Southend-on-Sea Streetscape Manual
  • Representation search for Southend-on-Sea Streetscape Manual
  • • The Southend-on-Sea Streetscape Manual - Introduction
    • • Representations made against 1.
    • Part A: Design Strategy
    • Part B: Design Detail
    • Appendix 1: 5 Stage 'Gateway' Design Process example
    • Appendix 2: Materials and Street Furniture Update Form
    • Appendix 3: Useful Websites
    • Appendix 4: Bibliography
  • Statement of Community Involvement
  • Representation search for Statement of Community Involvement
  • • Statement of Community Involvement
    • • Representations made against Introduction
      • Representations made against General Principles of Planning Consultations
  • Southend Central Area Action Plan & Proposals Map - Proposed Submission
  • Representation search for Southend Central Area Action Plan & Proposals Map - Proposed Submission
  • • List of Abbreviations Used
    • 1. Introduction
    • • Representations made against 3.
      • Representations made against 8.
    • 2. Strategic and local planning context
    • • Representations made against 33.
    • 3. Characteristics and key issues
    • • Representations made against 47.
      • Representations made against 49.
      • Representations made against 53.
      • Representations made against 62.
      • Representations made against 66.
      • Representations made against 69.
    • 4. Vision, Objectives and Strategy
    • • Representations made against 70.
      • Representations made against 72.
      • Representations made against 79.
      • Representations made against 81.
    • 5. Development Strategy for Key Uses
    • • Representations made against 106.
      • Representations made against Policy DS2: Shopping frontages and use of floors above shops
      • Representations made against Policy DS4: Employment development within the central area
      • Representations made against 146.
      • Representations made against Policy DS6: Provision of facilities for culture, leisure, tourism and entertainment
      • Representations made against 165
      • Representations made against Policy DS8: Housing
    • 6. Public Realm and Environmental Quality Strategy
    • • Representations made against 192
      • Representations made against 199
      • Representations made against PR1: Open Space Provision and the Environment
      • Representations made against 204
      • Representations made against PR2: Public Realm Enhancements
      • Representations made against PR3: Visually Active Frontages
      • Representations made against 213
      • Representations made against PR4: Protection of Visually Important Views
      • Representations made against PR5: Landmark Buildings
    • 7. The Historic Environment
    • • Representations made against 226
      • Representations made against HE1: The Clifftown Quarter
      • Representations made against HE5: Frontages of Townscape Merit in the Central Area
      • Representations made against 244
      • Representations made against 250
      • Representations made against 252
    • 8. Central Area Transport and Access Strategy
    • • Representations made against 255
      • Representations made against 261
      • Representations made against 262
      • Representations made against TA1: Town Centre and Central Area Highway Network
      • Representations made against TA1b: 'City Beach' Phase 2 - Traffic and Public Realm Scheme
      • Representations made against TA2: Public Transport
      • Representations made against 280
      • Representations made against 287
      • Representations made against TA3: Walking and Cycling
      • Representations made against 295
      • Representations made against 298
    • 9. Infrastructure Provision and Flood risk
    • • Representations made against IF1: Central Area Infrastructure
      • Representations made against IF3: Flood Risk Management
    • 10. Quarters and Proposal Site Policies
    • • Representations made against 329
      • Representations made against 344
      • Representations made against DP2: Queensway and London Road / Broadway Development Principles
      • Representations made against Proposal Site Policy PS2a: Sainsbury's and adjacent Buildings, London Road Proposal
      • Representations made against DP3: Elmer Square Development Principles
      • Representations made against DP4: Queensway and Southchurch Avenue Development Principles
      • Representations made against DP6: Clifftown Development Principles
      • Representations made against DP7: Tylers Avenue Development Principles
      • Representations made against 415
      • Representations made against 430
      • Representations made against CS2: Central Seafront Strategy - Key Principles
      • Representations made against 437
      • Representations made against 440
      • Representations made against CS3: Flood Risk
      • Representations made against CS4: Nature Conservation and Biodiversity
      • Representations made against CS5: The Waterfront
      • Representations made against CS6: Central Seafront Development Principles
      • Representations made against Proposal Site Policy CS6a: Southend Pier
      • Representations made against 473
      • Representations made against 474
      • Representations made against Proposal Site Policy CS6b: Seaway Car Park and Marine Parade
      • Representations made against CS7: Western Esplanade, The Cliffs and Shrubbery
      • Representations made against Proposal Site Policy CS7a: Cultural Centre and new Southend Museum
      • Representations made against CS8: Eastern Esplanade and City Beach Gateway
      • Representations made against Proposal Site Policy CS8a: Woodgrange Drive (Kursaal) Estate
      • Representations made against 515
      • Representations made against DP9: Victoria Gateway Neighbourhood Development Principles
      • Representations made against Proposal Site Policy PS9c: Roots Hall Football Ground and Environs
      • Representations made against Proposal Site Policy PS10a: Former B&Q Site
    • 11. Implementation
    • • Representations made against 580
      • Representations made against 607
      • Representations made against Proposals Map
    • Appendix 1
    • Appendix 2
    • Appendix 3
    • Appendix 4
    • Appendix 5
  • Development Management - Proposed Submission
  • Representation search for Development Management - Proposed Submission
  • • Section 1 - Introduction
    • Section 2 - Design and Townscape
    • Section 3 - The Seafront
    • Section 4 - Housing
    • Section 5 - Economic Development
    • Section 6 - Environmental Management
    • Section 7 - Sustainable Transport Management
    • Appendix 1 - Monitoring Framework
    • Appendix 2 - Southend-on-Sea Core Strategy - Objectives
    • Appendix 3 - Southend-on-Sea Core Strategy - Policies
    • Appendix 4 - Centre Hierarchy and Appropriate Uses
    • Appendix 5 - Vehicle Parking Standards
    • Appendix 6 - Proposals Map
  • Development Management Development Plan (DPD)
  • Representation search for Development Management Development Plan (DPD)
  • • Section 1 - Introduction
    • Section 2 - Development Management: Place Shaping in Southend-on-Sea
    • Section 3 - Development Management Policy Context
    • Section 4 - Design & Townscape
    • Section 5 - The Seafront
    • Section 6 - Residential Accomodation
    • Section 7 - Economic Development
    • Section 8 - Environmental Management
    • Section 9 - Transport and Accessibility
    • Appendix 1
    • Appendix 2
    • Appendix 3
    • Appendix 4
    • Appendix 5
    • Appendix 6
  • Southend Central Area Action Plan
  • Representation search for Southend Central Area Action Plan
  • • Section 1 - Introduction
    • Section 2 - Context
    • Section 3 - The Key Challenges to be Addressed
    • Section 4 - Vision for Southend Central Area Plan
    • Section 5 - Spatial Options
    • Section 6 - City by the Sea - The Concept
    • Section 7 - The Quarters and Key Sites
    • Section 8 - Development Management
    • Section 9 - Delivery and Monitoring
  • Planning Obligation - A Guide to Section 106 and Developer Contributions
  • Representation search for Planning Obligation - A Guide to Section 106 and Developer Contributions
  • • Section 1 - Introduction
    • Section 2 - Southend Borough Council's Approach to Planning Obligations
    • Section 3 - Procedure for Completing Planning Obligations
    • Section 4 - Frequently asked questions
    • Appendix 1
    • Appendix 2
    • Appendix 3
    • Appendix 4
  • Design and Townscape Guide - Refresh 2009 (Consultation Draft)
  • Representation search for Design and Townscape Guide - Refresh 2009 (Consultation Draft)
  • • Section 1 - Introduction
    • • Representations made against 1.1 The Status of this Guide
      • Representations made against 1.2 Consultation
      • Representations made against 1.5 How to Use the Guide
    • Section 2 - Design Principles
    • • Representations made against 2.1 Overview of Southend-on-Sea Borough
      • Representations made against 2.2 Site Appraisal
      • Representations made against 2.3 The Design Concept
    • Section 3 - Sustainable Development and Design
    • • Representations made against 3.1 Redevelopment or Refurbishment
      • Representations made against 3.2 Resource Minimisation
      • Representations made against 3.4 Site Layout and Orientation
      • Representations made against 3.6 Water Recycling and Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems
      • Representations made against 3.8 Code for Sustainable Homes
      • Representations made against 3.10 Mix of Uses
      • Representations made against 3.12 Biodiversity
      • Representations made against 3.13 Affordable Housing
    • Section 4 - The Historical Environment
    • • Representations made against 4.1 Significance and Recording
      • Representations made against 4.2 Enabling Development
      • Representations made against 4.4 Buildings on the Local List
      • Representations made against 4.5 Conservation Areas
      • Representations made against 4.8 Control of Permitted Development
    • Section 5 - Detailed Requirements for Good Design
    • • Representations made against 5.1 Common Issues for all Types of Development
    • Section 6 - Making an Application
    • • Representations made against 6.1 Pre-Application Discussions
      • Representations made against 6.3 Additional Supporting Documentation
      • Representations made against 6.4 Design Award Scheme
      • Representations made against 6.5 Planning Briefs, Design Briefs, Concept Statements & Masterplans
  • Rights of Way Improvement Plan (ROWIP)
  • Representation search for Rights of Way Improvement Plan (ROWIP)
  • • Section 1 - Introduction
    • • Representations made against Vision Statement
      • Representations made against Background
    • Section 2 - The Definitive Map and Statement
    • Section 3 - The Network
    • Section 4 - Current Provision
    • • Representations made against Ease of Use Survey
    • Section 5 - The Assessment
    • • Representations made against Specific Needs of Users
    • Section 6 - Evaluation
    • • Representations made against Analysis of Network
    • Section 7 - Future Demands and Links to Southend Borough Council's Strategic Documents
    • • Representations made against Local Transport Policy 2006-2011 (LTP2)
      • Representations made against Local Development Framework (LDF)
    • Section 8 - The Statement of Action
    • • Representations made against Core Actions
    • Section 9 - Funding
• Adopted documents
• • Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - February 2018
  • Representation search for Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - February 2018
  • • Part A: The Plan and its Context
    • Part B: Development Strategy
    • Part C: Policy Areas and Opportunity Sites
    • Part D: Implementation and Monitoring Framework
    • Appendix 1: Southend Core Strategy Policies
    • Appendix 2: Glossary of Abbreviations
    • Appendix 3: Schedule of Existing Landmark Buildings
    • Appendix 4: Flood Risk Management Technical Information
    • Appendix 5: Transport, Access and Public Realm Strategy
    • Appendix 6: Dwelling Figures for the Central Area - relationship with Core Strategy Requirements
    • Appendix 7: Replaced Saved Policies
    • Appendix 8: Marketing Evidence
    • Appendix 9: Publicly available paid for parking in Central Area South (area as defined in Map 4)
  • Development Management Document - Adopted July 2015
  • Representation search for Development Management Document - Adopted July 2015
  • • Section 1 - Introduction
    • Section 2 - Design and Townscape
    • Section 3 - The Seafront
    • Section 4 - Housing
    • Section 5 - Economic Development
    • Section 6 - Environmental Management
    • Section 7 - Sustainable Transport Management
    • Appendix 1 - Monitoring Framework
    • Appendix 2 - Southend on Sea Core Strategy Objectives
    • Appendix 3 - Southend on Sea Core Strategy Policies
    • Appendix 4 - Marketing and Market Demand Evidence
    • Appendix 5 - Centre Hierachyand Potential Uses
    • Appendix 6 - Vehicle Parking Standards
    • Appendix 7 - Primary Shopping Frontages
    • Appendix 8 - Secondary Shopping Frontages
    • Appendix 9 - Replaced Saved Planning Policies
    • Appendix 10 - List of Abbreviations
    • Appendix 11 - Seafront Buildings
  • Core Strategy - Adopted December 2007
  • Representation search for Core Strategy - Adopted December 2007
  • • Southend Context
    • Section 1: The Core Strategy - Aim and Strategic Objectives
    • Section 2: Core Strategy - Key Policies
    • Section 3: Employment Generating Development
    • Section 4: Town Centre and Retail Development
    • Section 5: Transport and Accessibility
    • Section 6: The Environmentand Urban Renaissance
    • Section 7: Minerals and Soils Resources
    • Section 8: Community Infrastructure
    • Section 9: Sport, Recreation and Green Space
    • Section 10: Dwelling Provision
    • Section 11: Monitoring and Review
    • Appendix 1: Background Documents and Technical Studies
    • Appendix2: Glossary/Definition of Terms of Used
  • London Southend Airport & Environs Joint Area Access Plan (JAAP)
  • Representation search for London Southend Airport & Environs Joint Area Access Plan (JAAP)
  • • 1. Introduction
    • 2. Vision and Objectives
    • 3. Developmet Proposals for the JAAP
    • 4. Policies
    • 5. Implementation and Delivery Plan
    • 6. Risks to Delivery
    • Appendix 1: Abbreviations
    • Joint Area Action Plan Proposals Map