Question 29: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing the waterfront? Please explain your answer.
Support
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Representation ID: 1956
Received: 08/02/2016
Respondent: Essex Chambers of Commerce
Agree with the prosed approach to managing the Waterfront
Comment
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Representation ID: 2287
Received: 21/01/2016
Respondent: Mr Rod Levin
Provide public Slipways over beach to promote use of small (sail) boats.
Comment
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Representation ID: 2355
Received: 15/02/2016
Respondent: Belfairs Gardens Residents Association
Similar to above in that it appears to open the possibility of development which could be manipulated. Transparency will be required in both nature conservation and the waterfront.
Comment
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Representation ID: 2391
Received: 12/02/2016
Respondent: Procuresure Consulting
People come to the sea side to sit on the beach so create more sand beaches. Yes there are small stretches that have been rejuvenated, however a lot more of the water front and shoreline need to be more accessible and enlarged, with the spits rebuilt and sand infilled to create beaches the length of the seafront; yes there are natural sites of interest and beach expansion can still happen if managed correctly. Reclaimed beaches across the world are the main success of any area. Example being the new beaches in Gibraltar which were introduced with sheltered sea walls has been the main success of those areas. The beach rather than the seafront road is the most important part of Southend when it comes to attracting tourism and local well-being and fitness.
Support
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Representation ID: 2426
Received: 25/02/2016
Respondent: Environment Agency
We support this policy which seeks to integrate tourism activities and recreation with the public realm and biodiversity features. We are particularly supportive of Point 2, which seems to prevent any impacts on biodiversity or flood risk.