Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Search representations
Results for Essex Chambers of Commerce search
New searchComment
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 27: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Central Seafront Policy Area and sites OS7, OS8, OS9 and CS1.1? Please explain your answer.
Representation ID: 1955
Received: 08/02/2016
Respondent: Essex Chambers of Commerce
Agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Central Seafront Policy Area and sites OS7, OS8, OS9 AND CS1.1 on the proviso that there is adequate car parking provision to support the growth in footfall
Support
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 29: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing the waterfront? Please explain your answer.
Representation ID: 1956
Received: 08/02/2016
Respondent: Essex Chambers of Commerce
Agree with the prosed approach to managing the Waterfront
Support
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 30:Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Victoria Avenue Gateway Neighbourhood Policy Area? Please explain your answer.
Representation ID: 1957
Received: 08/02/2016
Respondent: Essex Chambers of Commerce
Agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Victoria Avenue Gateway Neighbourhood Policy Area
Support
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 31: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Sutton Gateway Neighbourhood Policy Area? Please explain your answer.
Representation ID: 1958
Received: 08/02/2016
Respondent: Essex Chambers of Commerce
Agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Sutton Gateway Neighbourhood Policy Area
Support
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 32: Do you agree with the indicative phasing of development within the SCAAP area? If not, please explain your answer
Representation ID: 1959
Received: 08/02/2016
Respondent: Essex Chambers of Commerce
Agree with the indicative phasing of development within the SCAAP area
Support
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 33: Do you think it will be useful to include indicative figures for potential new development within this section of the Plan? Please explain your answer
Representation ID: 1960
Received: 08/02/2016
Respondent: Essex Chambers of Commerce
Believe it to be useful to include indicative figures for potential new development to enable private sector partners to fully appreciate the level of commitment required which will help to facilitate partnership working and delivery
Support
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 34: Do you think that it will be useful to include a series of projects and tasks within the Plan to help identify funding levels and co-ordination for delivery?
Representation ID: 1961
Received: 08/02/2016
Respondent: Essex Chambers of Commerce
Agree. Please see response to question 33
Support
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 35: Do you agree with the overall approach outlined for the Implementation Plan? If you have any suggestions or amendments to the approach or another approach please specify and give your rea
Representation ID: 1962
Received: 08/02/2016
Respondent: Essex Chambers of Commerce
Agree with overall approach for the Implementation Plan
Support
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 36: Do you agree with the approach outlining how the SCAAP will monitor the delivery of policies and proposals?
Representation ID: 1963
Received: 08/02/2016
Respondent: Essex Chambers of Commerce
Agree with Monitoring Framework
Support
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 37: Do you have any other general and further comments on this document?
Representation ID: 1964
Received: 08/02/2016
Respondent: Essex Chambers of Commerce
No further comments
