Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Search representations
Results for Southend BID search
New searchComment
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 20: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the High Street Policy Area? Please explain your answer. If you consider that the timescales for delivering developm
Representation ID: 2251
Received: 15/02/2016
Respondent: Southend BID
84% of respondents scored the High Street as a top 10 priority
Comment
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 27: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Central Seafront Policy Area and sites OS7, OS8, OS9 and CS1.1? Please explain your answer.
Representation ID: 2252
Received: 15/02/2016
Respondent: Southend BID
68% of recipients scored the Seafront as a top 10 priority.
Comment
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 21: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the London Road Policy Area? Please explain your answer. If you consider that the timescale for delivering OS15 shou
Representation ID: 2253
Received: 15/02/2016
Respondent: Southend BID
34% scored the London Road as a top 10 priority.
Comment
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 23: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Queensway Policy Area and Opportunity Site 4: Queensway? Please explain your answer.
Representation ID: 2254
Received: 15/02/2016
Respondent: Southend BID
Queensway was scored by 24% response as a top 10 priority
Comment
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 24:Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Warrior Square Policy Area and Opportunity Site 5: Warrior Square? Please explain your answer
Representation ID: 2255
Received: 15/02/2016
Respondent: Southend BID
Warrior Square was scored by 18% as a top 10 priority.
Comment
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 25: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Clifftown Policy Area? Please explain your answer.
Representation ID: 2256
Received: 15/02/2016
Respondent: Southend BID
Clifftown was scored by 18% as a top 10 priority
Comment
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 26: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Tylers Policy Area and Opportunity Site 6: Tylers Avenue? Please explain your answer.
Representation ID: 2257
Received: 15/02/2016
Respondent: Southend BID
Tylers was scored by 22% of respondents as a top 10 priority
Comment
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 31: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Sutton Gateway Neighbourhood Policy Area? Please explain your answer.
Representation ID: 2258
Received: 15/02/2016
Respondent: Southend BID
Sutton Neighbourhood was scored by 22% of respondents as a top 10 priority.
Comment
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 30:Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Victoria Avenue Gateway Neighbourhood Policy Area? Please explain your answer.
Representation ID: 2259
Received: 15/02/2016
Respondent: Southend BID
Victoria Neighbourhood was scored by 22% of respondents as a top 10 priority.
Comment
Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) Preferred Approach 2015
Question 27: Do you agree with the proposed approach to managing development within the Central Seafront Policy Area and sites OS7, OS8, OS9 and CS1.1? Please explain your answer.
Representation ID: 2260
Received: 15/02/2016
Respondent: Southend BID
Due to the topography of the Seaway Car Park there is an opportunity to cut into the site and create a formal entrance that can create a visual gateway as part of the access route. There is an opportunity to accommodate somewhere in the region of 1500 parking spaces arranged over 2-3-4 floors. Traffic movements would then come in directly at the northern edge of the site and filter through into the layered car park.
To the south side Lucy Road could then be completely pedestrianised and a punch through to the seafront creating a large piazza activated by new A1, A3 uses to compliment both the Central Seafront and the links into the High Street. The pedestrian link would then improve the environs around St John's church. To drive some additional value it is perfectly legitimate to consider a number of floors of residential uses above the car park and retail/A3 commercial offer.
