Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Schedule of Modifications to the Revised Proposed Submission

Search Representations

Results for Southend United Football Club (SUFC) search

New search New search

Object

Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Schedule of Modifications to the Revised Proposed Submission

Main 2

Representation ID: 2923

Received: 22/09/2017

Respondent: Southend United Football Club (SUFC)

Representation Summary:

The proposed wording of DS1.1 in the Schedule of Modifications replicates the proposed wording of SBP and IP in its entirety and therefore, on behalf of SUFC I wish to re-emphasise that the wording is unsound and re-submit our proposed wording.

Full text:

The proposed wording of DS1.1 in the Schedule of Modifications replicates the proposed wording of SBP and IP in its entirety and therefore, on behalf of SUFC I wish to re-emphasise that the wording is unsound and re-submit our proposed wording. In support of representations made on behalf of Stockvale Group and Turnstone, our letter of the 14th July highlighted that policy CS1.2 was unsound as the delivery of a commercially viable cinema would not be able to achieve the policy requirement for no net loss in car parking provision. However, no modifications have been made regarding policy CS1.2. Therefore, I wish to re-emphasise that this policy should not be made as it is highly uncertain that a leisure focused development on the Seaways Car Park could be viably delivered during the SCAAP Plan period.

Object

Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Schedule of Modifications to the Revised Proposed Submission

Proposed Schedule of Modifications

Representation ID: 2924

Received: 22/09/2017

Respondent: Southend United Football Club (SUFC)

Representation Summary:

In support of representations made on behalf of Stockvale Group and Turnstone, our letter of the 14th July highlighted that policy CS1.2 was unsound as the delivery of a commercially viable cinema would not be able to achieve the policy requirement for no net loss in car parking provision. However, no modifications have been made regarding policy CS1.2. Therefore, I wish to re-emphasise that this policy should not be made as it is highly uncertain that a leisure focused development on the Seaways Car Park could be viably delivered during the SCAAP Plan period.

Full text:

The proposed wording of DS1.1 in the Schedule of Modifications replicates the proposed wording of SBP and IP in its entirety and therefore, on behalf of SUFC I wish to re-emphasise that the wording is unsound and re-submit our proposed wording. In support of representations made on behalf of Stockvale Group and Turnstone, our letter of the 14th July highlighted that policy CS1.2 was unsound as the delivery of a commercially viable cinema would not be able to achieve the policy requirement for no net loss in car parking provision. However, no modifications have been made regarding policy CS1.2. Therefore, I wish to re-emphasise that this policy should not be made as it is highly uncertain that a leisure focused development on the Seaways Car Park could be viably delivered during the SCAAP Plan period.

If you are having trouble using the system, please try our help guide.