Southend Central Area Action Plan (SCAAP) - Schedule of Modifications to the Revised Proposed Submission

The proposed wording of DS1.1 in the Schedule of Modifications replicates the proposed wording of SBP and IP in its entirety and therefore, on behalf of SUFC I wish to re-emphasise that the wording is unsound and re-submit our proposed wording. In support of representations made on behalf of Stockvale Group and Turnstone, our letter of the 14th July highlighted that policy CS1.2 was unsound as the delivery of a commercially viable cinema would not be able to achieve the policy requirement for no net loss in car parking provision. However, no modifications have been made regarding policy CS1.2. Therefore, I wish to re-emphasise that this policy should not be made as it is highly uncertain that a leisure focused development on the Seaways Car Park could be viably delivered during the SCAAP Plan period.

The proposed wording of DS1.1 in the Schedule of Modifications replicates the proposed wording of SBP and IP in its entirety and therefore, on behalf of SUFC I wish to re-emphasise that the wording is unsound and re-submit our proposed wording. In support of representations made on behalf of Stockvale Group and Turnstone, our letter of the 14th July highlighted that policy CS1.2 was unsound as the delivery of a commercially viable cinema would not be able to achieve the policy requirement for no net loss in car parking provision. However, no modifications have been made regarding policy CS1.2. Therefore, I wish to re-emphasise that this policy should not be made as it is highly uncertain that a leisure focused development on the Seaways Car Park could be viably delivered during the SCAAP Plan period.