Development Management - Proposed Submission

Search representations

Results for Essex County Council search

New search New search

Support

Development Management - Proposed Submission

1.8

Representation ID: 1216

Received: 06/06/2011

Respondent: Essex County Council

Representation Summary:

Paragraph 1.8 and 1.9 - the principle that the policies within the Development Management DPD should read alongside other statutory policy documents, and with each other, is fully supported. However, the statements would benefit from additional highlighting within the text, perhaps by 'boxing' them and giving the title 'Relationship of Policies'. The paragraphs could also be usefully added for reference to the 'Policies' list in the contents section. The cross-referencing policies could be reinforced at appropriate points within the document, particularly the need for users to read and apply Policy DM16 alongside other Policies.

Attachments:

Comment

Development Management - Proposed Submission

2.19

Representation ID: 1217

Received: 06/06/2011

Respondent: Essex County Council

Representation Summary:

Paragraph 2.19 - should read also reference the Parklands Vision (2008) as a key document.

Attachments:

Comment

Development Management - Proposed Submission

3.13

Representation ID: 1218

Received: 06/06/2011

Respondent: Essex County Council

Representation Summary:

Paragraph 3.13 - the reference to the Greengrid Strategy is welcome but reference should be made to delivery of the Strategic Thames Estuary Path (Survey 2008).

Attachments:

Comment

Development Management - Proposed Submission

Policy DM6 - The Seafront

Representation ID: 1219

Received: 06/06/2011

Respondent: Essex County Council

Representation Summary:

Policy DM6 (The Seafront) - the policy could more proactively support the natural areas by adding a third measure to the first paragraph of the Policy.

Attachments:

Comment

Development Management - Proposed Submission

3.14

Representation ID: 1220

Received: 06/06/2011

Respondent: Essex County Council

Representation Summary:

Paragraph 3.14 - the reference to National Biodiversity designations is welcome but particular reference to their local importance could be included.

Attachments:

Comment

Development Management - Proposed Submission

Policy DM8 - Residential Standards

Representation ID: 1221

Received: 06/06/2011

Respondent: Essex County Council

Representation Summary:

Paragraph 4.14 and Policy DM8 (Residential Standards) Policy Table 4 (Residential Standards) - the text of paragraph 4.14 and Policy Table 4 is inconsistent in respect of minimum storage area 'for each additional occupant'. The paragraph refers to 0.5m2 whereas the Policy Table refers to 0.25m2. Either the values should be consistent or the document should explain the reasons for the variation.

Attachments:

Support

Development Management - Proposed Submission

1.1

Representation ID: 1432

Received: 06/06/2011

Respondent: Essex County Council

Representation Summary:

Essex County Council fully supports the preparation of the Development Management DPD. It will provide more detailed guidance which should greatly assist the process of securing high quality sustainable development in support of the strategic vision of the Core Strategy and meeting the needs of the community. The emphasis on a positive and proactive approach in pursuit of achieving better development outcomes through the whole Development Management process is welcomed.

The County Council considers that the Proposed Submission is 'sound' but that the future use and practical application of the document would benefit from further reflection on a limited number of matters, which are set out in the original submission and summarised in representations 1216-1221.

Attachments:

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.