Support

Representation ID: 938

Received: 19/10/2010

Respondent: Environment Agency

Issue DM8: Question 33
We generally agree with the approach being taken in this suggested option. Public realm and open space along the seafront presents opportunities to tie-in with the Thames Gateway Parklands vision and the wider green-grid initiatives.

Under part 1 we would suggest that native planting is sought rather than purely aesthetic planting. Using species of local provenance would maximise the ecological value of sites.

As mentioned above, under Part 3, seeking opportunities for the incorporation of innovative flood defences into public realm and open space design would not only afford protection to the development, but could also make better use of the riverfront areas. The TE2100 Plan provides a vision for this area where improvements to the flood risk management system provide amenity, recreation and environmental enhancement. This could also positively contribute to the Thames Gateway Parklands vision.

Under Part 11 you should also ensure that development will improve and enhance biodiversity and the natural environment. Where flood defences are to be redesigned or improved as part of a development, their design can add to the ecological value of the area. Setting back defences in some areas could also allow for foreshore habitat enhancement or recreation to mitigate for the impacts of coastal squeeze brought about by climate change.