Section 9 - Funding

Showing comments and forms 1 to 3 of 3

Object

Rights of Way Improvement Plan (ROWIP)

Representation ID: 12

Received: 07/02/2009

Respondent: Dr P D Wadey

Representation Summary:

In respect of the statutory duties, a commitment to achieving them by a specified date should be given. Failure to give due dates would imply that the Council didn't wish to be held to account, which I am sure is not the case.

Comment

Rights of Way Improvement Plan (ROWIP)

Representation ID: 20

Received: 24/02/2009

Respondent: Essex LAF

Representation Summary:

Table (no reference number!) -
The table does not provide any schedule for the outcomes of the proposed actions. A statement that the PROWIP has to be approved before a schedule can be established is not acceptable.
A proposed schedule for each action should be included with any necessary provisos.

Comment

Rights of Way Improvement Plan (ROWIP)

Representation ID: 21

Received: 24/02/2009

Respondent: Essex LAF

Representation Summary:

Appendix 2 - Cycle Map
Although this map published by SoS BC indicates a Country Park to the north of the Borough, no mention is made of this in the ROWIP. Even if the provision of this is still tentative, there is no reason not to include the intention to provide PROWs within the park and to show how these would link to PROWs outside the area e.g. Roach Valley Way.