Southend Central Area Action Plan & Proposals Map - Proposed Submission
Search representations
Results for Environment Agency search
New searchSupport
Southend Central Area Action Plan & Proposals Map - Proposed Submission
PR2: Public Realm Enhancements
Representation ID: 1284
Received: 13/10/2011
Respondent: Environment Agency
encourge the use of green walls, roofs and roof gardens. These will add biodiversity benefit and they can contribute to increasing the energy efficiency of buildings and assist in attenuating rain water flow.
Section 4.9 of the Sustainablity Apprasial supports this.
encourge the use of green walls, roofs and roof gardens. These will add biodiversity benefit and they can contribute to increasing the energy efficiency of buildings and assist in attenuating rain water flow.
Section 4.9 of the Sustainablity Apprasial supports this.
Support
Southend Central Area Action Plan & Proposals Map - Proposed Submission
TA1b: 'City Beach' Phase 2 - Traffic and Public Realm Scheme
Representation ID: 1285
Received: 13/10/2011
Respondent: Environment Agency
1 h) Any development along the seafront as part of the city beach must not impact on the Foreshore designations.
1 h) Any development along the seafront as part of the city beach must not impact on the Foreshore designations.
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan & Proposals Map - Proposed Submission
IF1: Central Area Infrastructure
Representation ID: 1286
Received: 13/10/2011
Respondent: Environment Agency
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Southend WCS scoping 2009, indicates that Southen WWTW cannot treat further effluent as it is already at capacity. There is a contraint on development in the Southend WWTW catchment until the quality and capacity issues are addressed.
The policy must reflect this by saying that infrastructure improvements must be implemeted prior to developments coming online.
Southend WCS scoping 2009, indicates that Southen WWTW cannot treat further effluent as it is already at capacity. There is a contraint on development in the Southend WWTW catchment until the quality and capacity issues are addressed.
The policy must reflect this by saying that infrastructure improvements must be implemeted prior to developments coming online.
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan & Proposals Map - Proposed Submission
IF3: Flood Risk Management
Representation ID: 1287
Received: 13/10/2011
Respondent: Environment Agency
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The policy only refers to areas of Local Flood risk and surface water drainage princples. This policy should also require Flood Risk Assessments in areas of Flood Zone 2 and 3, as shown in the SFRA maps and Environment Agency maps.
The policy only refers to areas of Local Flood risk and surface water drainage princples. This policy should also require Flood Risk Assessments in areas of Flood Zone 2 and 3, as shown in the SFRA maps and Environment Agency maps.
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan & Proposals Map - Proposed Submission
329
Representation ID: 1288
Received: 13/10/2011
Respondent: Environment Agency
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
development proposals should also include an energy and resource efficieny statement to detail sustainable construction methods and how the development will achieve a Code for Sustainable Homes level 3 as a minimum as required by policy DM2. The Sustainablilty appraisal conclusions supports this (ref para 19.28)
development proposals should also include an energy and resource efficieny statement to detail sustainable construction methods and how the development will achieve a Code for Sustainable Homes level 3 as a minimum as required by policy DM2. The Sustainablilty appraisal conclusions supports this (ref para 19.28)
Support
Southend Central Area Action Plan & Proposals Map - Proposed Submission
DP2: Queensway and London Road / Broadway Development Principles
Representation ID: 1289
Received: 13/10/2011
Respondent: Environment Agency
We support the encouragement of urban greening projects. We encourge the use of green walls, roofs and roof gardens. These will add biodiversity benefit and they can contribute to increasing the energy efficiency of buildings and assist in attenuating rain water flow. Section 4.9 of the Sustainablity Apprasial supports this.
We support the encouragement of urban greening projects. We encourge the use of green walls, roofs and roof gardens. These will add biodiversity benefit and they can contribute to increasing the energy efficiency of buildings and assist in attenuating rain water flow. Section 4.9 of the Sustainablity Apprasial supports this.
Support
Southend Central Area Action Plan & Proposals Map - Proposed Submission
DP3: Elmer Square Development Principles
Representation ID: 1290
Received: 13/10/2011
Respondent: Environment Agency
Support the need to assess the surface water flood risk to the development site.
Support the need to assess the surface water flood risk to the development site.
Support
Southend Central Area Action Plan & Proposals Map - Proposed Submission
DP4: Queensway and Southchurch Avenue Development Principles
Representation ID: 1291
Received: 13/10/2011
Respondent: Environment Agency
Support the need to assess surface water flood risk to the development site.
Support the need to assess surface water flood risk to the development site.
Support
Southend Central Area Action Plan & Proposals Map - Proposed Submission
DP4: Queensway and Southchurch Avenue Development Principles
Representation ID: 1292
Received: 13/10/2011
Respondent: Environment Agency
support the need to assess suface water flood risk on the site in relation to the development proposals.
support the need to assess suface water flood risk on the site in relation to the development proposals.
Support
Southend Central Area Action Plan & Proposals Map - Proposed Submission
DP6: Clifftown Development Principles
Representation ID: 1293
Received: 13/10/2011
Respondent: Environment Agency
We support the need to assess suface water flood risk on the site in relation to the development proposals.
We support the need to assess suface water flood risk on the site in relation to the development proposals.