Development Management Development Plan (DPD)

Search representations

Results for Environment Agency search

New search New search

Support

Development Management Development Plan (DPD)

33. Do you agree with the suggested option?

Representation ID: 938

Received: 19/10/2010

Respondent: Environment Agency

Representation Summary:

Issue DM8: Question 33
We generally agree with the approach being taken in this suggested option. Public realm and open space along the seafront presents opportunities to tie-in with the Thames Gateway Parklands vision and the wider green-grid initiatives.

Under part 1 we would suggest that native planting is sought rather than purely aesthetic planting. Using species of local provenance would maximise the ecological value of sites.

As mentioned above, under Part 3, seeking opportunities for the incorporation of innovative flood defences into public realm and open space design would not only afford protection to the development, but could also make better use of the riverfront areas. The TE2100 Plan provides a vision for this area where improvements to the flood risk management system provide amenity, recreation and environmental enhancement. This could also positively contribute to the Thames Gateway Parklands vision.

Under Part 11 you should also ensure that development will improve and enhance biodiversity and the natural environment. Where flood defences are to be redesigned or improved as part of a development, their design can add to the ecological value of the area. Setting back defences in some areas could also allow for foreshore habitat enhancement or recreation to mitigate for the impacts of coastal squeeze brought about by climate change.

Comment

Development Management Development Plan (DPD)

43. Are there any other issues regarding water recreation activities that you think the Council should consider?

Representation ID: 939

Received: 19/10/2010

Respondent: Environment Agency

Representation Summary:

Issue DM10: Question 43
New and improved facilities for water recreation should not adversely impact upon biodiversity. They should also not compromise flood risk management infrastructure or the ability to maintain this into the future.

Comment

Development Management Development Plan (DPD)

46. Are there any other housing matters that the Council should consider as a part of this issue?

Representation ID: 940

Received: 19/10/2010

Respondent: Environment Agency

Representation Summary:

Issue DM11: Question 46
Ideally bungalows should be avoided in areas of flood risk.

Support

Development Management Development Plan (DPD)

91. Are there any other land contamination issues that need to be considered?

Representation ID: 941

Received: 19/10/2010

Respondent: Environment Agency

Representation Summary:

Issue DM24: Question 91
We support the wording of the proposed policy. The policy could be strengthened by recommending Global Remediation Strategies for certain sites. If the development of an area is under one ownership and is to be undertaken over a number of years some thought should be given to assessment of the site from a global or strategic perspective and planning long term sustainable remediation options where appropriate.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.