Southend Central Area Action Plan & Proposals Map - Proposed Submission
Search representations
Results for Sainsbury's Supermarkets LTD search
New searchObject
Southend Central Area Action Plan & Proposals Map - Proposed Submission
Proposal Site Policy PS2a: Sainsbury's and adjacent Buildings, London Road Proposal
Representation ID: 1355
Received: 25/11/2011
Respondent: Sainsbury's Supermarkets LTD
Agent: Indigo Planning Ltd
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
We consider that proposal site policy ps2a is unsound as it is currently drafted as it is not justified nor effective. the policy does not take account of Sainsbury's obligation to prepare a joint development brief should they relocate from the site, nor is there any justification provided as to why uses not usually found in town centres are being promoted on a site which is predominantly located in the primary shopping area of Southend town centre.
We consider that proposal site policy ps2a is unsound as it is currently drafted as it is not justified nor effective. the policy does not take account of Sainsbury's obligation to prepare a joint development brief should they relocate from the site, nor is there any justification provided as to why uses not usually found in town centres are being promoted on a site which is predominantly located in the primary shopping area of Southend town centre.
We consider that proposal site policy ps10a is unsound as the allocation is not effective nor justified and it would compromise the deliverability of the AAP as a whole by using up all the network capacity for the medium/long term and preventing schemes such as the redevelopment of roots hall which has outline consent and relocation of Sainsbury's from London round coming forward.
Support
Southend Central Area Action Plan & Proposals Map - Proposed Submission
Proposal Site Policy PS9c: Roots Hall Football Ground and Environs
Representation ID: 1356
Received: 25/11/2011
Respondent: Sainsbury's Supermarkets LTD
Agent: Indigo Planning Ltd
support
We consider that proposal site policy ps2a is unsound as it is currently drafted as it is not justified nor effective. the policy does not take account of Sainsbury's obligation to prepare a joint development brief should they relocate from the site, nor is there any justification provided as to why uses not usually found in town centres are being promoted on a site which is predominantly located in the primary shopping area of Southend town centre.
We consider that proposal site policy ps10a is unsound as the allocation is not effective nor justified and it would compromise the deliverability of the AAP as a whole by using up all the network capacity for the medium/long term and preventing schemes such as the redevelopment of roots hall which has outline consent and relocation of Sainsbury's from London round coming forward.
Object
Southend Central Area Action Plan & Proposals Map - Proposed Submission
Proposal Site Policy PS10a: Former B&Q Site
Representation ID: 1357
Received: 25/11/2011
Respondent: Sainsbury's Supermarkets LTD
Agent: Indigo Planning Ltd
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
We consider that proposal site policy ps10a is unsound as the allocation is not effective nor justified and it would compromise the deliverability of the AAP as a whole by using up all the network capacity for the medium/long term and preventing schemes such as the redevelopment of roots hall which has outline consent and relocation of Sainsbury's from London round coming forward.
We consider that proposal site policy ps2a is unsound as it is currently drafted as it is not justified nor effective. the policy does not take account of Sainsbury's obligation to prepare a joint development brief should they relocate from the site, nor is there any justification provided as to why uses not usually found in town centres are being promoted on a site which is predominantly located in the primary shopping area of Southend town centre.
We consider that proposal site policy ps10a is unsound as the allocation is not effective nor justified and it would compromise the deliverability of the AAP as a whole by using up all the network capacity for the medium/long term and preventing schemes such as the redevelopment of roots hall which has outline consent and relocation of Sainsbury's from London round coming forward.